UCLA Brands Evading Diversity and Inclusivity

September 20, 2022

UCLA Brands Evading Diversity and Inclusivity

Order ID:89JHGSJE83839

Style:APA/MLA/Harvard/Chicago

Pages:5-10

Instructions:

UCLA Brands Evading Diversity and Inclusivity

I’m working on a communications question and need an explanation and answer to help me learn.

1: In your examples, please include IMAGES or URL(s) for each example, and if you are attaching/embedding an image, please specify (if not obvious) where this was found. You may, of course, include more than one image/URL example for your answer.

2: Please share a specific example(s) of a brand(s) that are accounting for the importance of diversity and inclusion in their use of social media? Include visuals and/or URL to support your brand example choices.

3: In sharing 1-2 examples of brands using a hashtag to create a seamless audience experience, be sure to be specific and include in your answer article link(s), URLs to the campaign, visuals, etc., that help support how they did this and perhaps even why it was successful (if possible).

You can use this article to help answer questions. https://www.techrepublic.com/article/5-social-medi..

Berkeley Controlling Communication Essay

Part2: Article Share

Students should seek to remain aware of applicable current events that pertain to the topics discussed in class by reading the business, politics and cover sections of papers such as the New York Times, Washington Business Journal, AdAge, Fast Company, PR Week, Washington Post, or other reliable information sources. Also read and view various international media to expand your discourse on global issues, as well as to strengthen your intercultural competence. Each class meeting, each student will brief share (2-3m) the highpoints of a particular article and your thoughts/interpretations (i.e. the issue, pros/cons, strategies, problems, critiques, etc.),

RUBRIC

Excellent Quality

95-100%

Introduction

45-41 points

The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned.

Literature Support

91-84 points

The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned.

Methodology

58-53 points

Content is well-organized with headings for each slide and bulleted lists to group related material as needed. Use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. to enhance readability and presentation content is excellent. Length requirements of 10 slides/pages or less is met.

Average Score

50-85%

40-38 points

More depth/detail for the background and significance is needed, or the research detail is not clear. No search history information is provided.

83-76 points

Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is little integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are included. Summary of information presented is included. Conclusion may not contain a biblical integration.

52-49 points

Content is somewhat organized, but no structure is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. is occasionally detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met.

Poor Quality

0-45%

37-1 points

The background and/or significance are missing. No search history information is provided.

75-1 points

Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is no integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are not included in the summary of information presented. Conclusion does not contain a biblical integration.

48-1 points

There is no clear or logical organizational structure. No logical sequence is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects etc. is often detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met