UCSB Healthy Relationship with The Natural World Essay
Order ID:89JHGSJE83839 Style:APA/MLA/Harvard/Chicago Pages:5-10 Instructions:
UCSB Healthy Relationship with The Natural World Essay
Description
Please submit in .docx or PDF format. LATE ASSIGNMENTS WILL NOT BE ACCEPTD
In the space of 3-3 1/2 pages (no more!) and with direct reference to course materials (My notes, the text, videos, etc.) please write on the following:
With reference to McDougall’s article “Spirited Away” and any other relevant course materials (you can also add an outside source of your choice if you want), please respond to the following: How does McDougall understand Heidegger’s loss of the “gods?” Do you think we have truly lost touch with the natural world through the proliferation of technology? If so, is there any way to restore a healthy relationship with the natural world? Make sure to explain your response. UCSB Healthy Relationship with The Natural World Essay
Feel free to use either MLA or APA formats, but make sure to use one and cite your sources as well as make in text citations of course materials. If you need help with formatting, please see to following link.
https://owl.purdue.edu/owl/purdue_owl.html (Links to an external site.)
https://iai.tv/articles/spirited-away-meets-heideg…
https://www.youtube.com/results?search_query=spirited+away
UCSB Healthy Relationship with The Natural World Essay
RUBRIC
Excellent Quality
95-100%
Introduction 45-41 points
The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned.
Literature Support
91-84 points
The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned.
Methodology
58-53 points
Content is well-organized with headings for each slide and bulleted lists to group related material as needed. Use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. to enhance readability and presentation content is excellent. Length requirements of 10 slides/pages or less is met.
Average Score
50-85%
40-38 points
More depth/detail for the background and significance is needed, or the research detail is not clear. No search history information is provided.
83-76 points
Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is little integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are included. Summary of information presented is included. Conclusion may not contain a biblical integration.
52-49 points
Content is somewhat organized, but no structure is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. is occasionally detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met.
Poor Quality
0-45%
37-1 points
The background and/or significance are missing. No search history information is provided.
75-1 points
Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is no integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are not included in the summary of information presented. Conclusion does not contain a biblical integration.
48-1 points
There is no clear or logical organizational structure. No logical sequence is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects etc. is often detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met
You Can Also Place the Order at www.collegepaper.us/orders/ordernow or www.crucialessay.com/orders/ordernow