Order ID:89JHGSJE83839 | Style:APA/MLA/Harvard/Chicago | Pages:5-10 |
Instructions:
Introduction
Employee Value Proposition-Is it good enough?
Unit Learning Outcomes
Assess practical significance of application forms, bio-data, and reference checks. (1)
Design content valid situational and behavioral interviews (5)
Assess practical significance of various ability tests. (6)
Assess practical significance of integrity tests. (6)
Assess practical significance of work sample tests. (7)
Appraise strategies to limit adverse impact in the interview process. (1)
Evaluate personality testing (6)
Directions
Answer the following questions:
1. Research a job position at your current organization, or an organization you prefer. Develop 2 behavioral and 2 situational questions for the interview. Include an anchored scoring system for all of the questions.
2. In addition to the interview, you want to add another selection assessment to accompany the structured interview questions you designed. Select one, and give your recommendations, with support, for why it should be chosen above the others.
Submission Requirements
The submission should:
be 8 pages
include a title and reference page
follow APA 7th edition formatting
include 5 outside sources
o Note: These should be primarily from professional, e.g. Harvard Business Review, and scholarly sources e.g. Personnel Psychology, Journal of Management, or Academy of Management Review
Understanding Employee Value Proposition
RUBRIC |
||||||
Excellent Quality 95-100%
|
Introduction
45-41 points The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned. |
Literature Support 91-84 points The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned. |
Methodology 58-53 points Content is well-organized with headings for each slide and bulleted lists to group related material as needed. Use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. to enhance readability and presentation content is excellent. Length requirements of 10 slides/pages or less is met. |
|||
Average Score 50-85% |
40-38 points More depth/detail for the background and significance is needed, or the research detail is not clear. No search history information is provided. |
83-76 points Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is little integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are included. Summary of information presented is included. Conclusion may not contain a biblical integration. |
52-49 points Content is somewhat organized, but no structure is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. is occasionally detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met. |
|||
Poor Quality 0-45% |
37-1 points The background and/or significance are missing. No search history information is provided. |
75-1 points Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is no integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are not included in the summary of information presented. Conclusion does not contain a biblical integration. |
48-1 points There is no clear or logical organizational structure. No logical sequence is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects etc. is often detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met |
|||
You Can Also Place the Order at www.collegepaper.us/orders/ordernow or www.crucialessay.com/orders/ordernow |
Understanding Employee Value Proposition