Unethical Behaviors Almost Every Day Discussion

March 4, 2022

Unethical Behaviors Almost Every Day Discussion

Order ID:89JHGSJE83839 Style:APA/MLA/Harvard/Chicago Pages:5-10

Instructions:

I’m trying to learn for my Business Law class and I’m stuck. Can you help?

Incrementalism is the slippery slope that can cause people to slide unintentionally into unethical behavior. It can happen when people cut small corners that become bigger over time. For example, almost every instance of accounting fraud begins with people fudging small numbers that grow larger and larger. Given this human tendency toward Incrementalism, one psychologist has written, “The first dishonest act is the most important one to prevent.” Do you agree? Why or why not?

It’s a slippery slope that may lead individuals to unknowingly engage in immoral activity because of incrementalism. It’s possible for individuals to cut shortcuts that grow into larger ones over time.

Starting with a modest quantity, fraudsters gradually build their scams into more and more elaborate schemes. One psychologist has remarked, “The first dishonest act is the most crucial one to avoid” because of this human predisposition toward Incrementalism. Isn’t that right? Is there a reason for this or not?

Unethical Behaviors Almost Every Day Discussion

RUBRIC

Excellent Quality

95-100%

Introduction

45-41 points

The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned.

Literature Support

91-84 points

The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned.

Methodology

58-53 points

Content is well-organized with headings for each slide and bulleted lists to group related material as needed. Use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. to enhance readability and presentation content is excellent. Length requirements of 10 slides/pages or less is met.

Average Score

50-85%

40-38 points

More depth/detail for the background and significance is needed, or the research detail is not clear. No search history information is provided.

83-76 points

Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is little integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are included. Summary of information presented is included. Conclusion may not contain a biblical integration.

52-49 points

Content is somewhat organized, but no structure is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. is occasionally detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met.

Poor Quality

0-45%

37-1 points

The background and/or significance are missing. No search history information is provided.

75-1 points

Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is no integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are not included in the summary of information presented. Conclusion does not contain a biblical integration.

48-1 points

There is no clear or logical organizational structure. No logical sequence is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects etc. is often detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met