Unethical Competition Management Case Study Discussion Solution 1

September 19, 2022

Unethical Competition Management Case Study Discussion

Order ID:89JHGSJE83839

Style:APA/MLA/Harvard/Chicago

Pages:5-10

Instructions:

Unethical Competition Management Case Study Discussion

You will analyze one short cases, located here. Your analysis of each case study should

identify the critical issues (i.e., root causes of the dilemma(s)), as well as propose

recommendations to improve or solve those issues. For each case, the text of the analysis should

encompass ~500-750 words This

assignment is relatively short, so I clearly desire quality (i.e., thoughtful integration of course

concepts) more than quantity. This assignment will be submitted via Turnitin using the

submission link located in the Individual Case Study Analysis folder in Blackboard

https://docs.google.com/document/d/1nlxVqXSGFlOEpv…

Learning Training and Talent Development Discussion

Learning, training, and talent development are some of the most important methods to align staff with organizational strategy. They can help the organization to ensure that employees are equipped with the necessary competencies needed to address today’s ever-changing work environment (due to technological changes, marketplace disruptions, innovative practices, etc.). To ensure the effectiveness of a performance management program, learning, training, and development must be encompassed.

Select an organization that you have worked for or are currently employed by. Then, explain the following:

How is learning, training, and talent development incorporated into the performance management system?

Imagine you are the HR Manager for this company. Explain what you would do to ensure that the learning, training, and talent development opportunities offered enhance workplace success and also meet the needs of Saudi Vision 2030.

RUBRIC

Excellent Quality

95-100%

Introduction

45-41 points

The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned.

Literature Support

91-84 points

The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned.

Methodology

58-53 points

Content is well-organized with headings for each slide and bulleted lists to group related material as needed. Use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. to enhance readability and presentation content is excellent. Length requirements of 10 slides/pages or less is met.

Average Score

50-85%

40-38 points

More depth/detail for the background and significance is needed, or the research detail is not clear. No search history information is provided.

83-76 points

Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is little integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are included. Summary of information presented is included. Conclusion may not contain a biblical integration.

52-49 points

Content is somewhat organized, but no structure is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. is occasionally detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met.

Poor Quality

0-45%

37-1 points

The background and/or significance are missing. No search history information is provided.

75-1 points

Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is no integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are not included in the summary of information presented. Conclusion does not contain a biblical integration.

48-1 points

There is no clear or logical organizational structure. No logical sequence is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects etc. is often detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met