UOP Talent Management Approaches Paper

September 19, 2022

UOP Talent Management Approaches Paper

Order ID:89JHGSJE83839

Style:APA/MLA/Harvard/Chicago

Pages:5-10

Instructions:

UOP Talent Management Approaches Paper

This reflection activity is comprised of two sections collectively totaling a minimum of 500 words. Complete your reflections by responding to all prompts.

Job Search

Visit https://www.onetonline.org/. In the search box, search for your current job, a job you know well, or a job you may aspire toward. (Please choose Property Manager for me, and go with the first option that comes up Property, Real Estate, and Community Association Managers)

Answer the questions below based on the job you searched for:

What is the job title?

What are the top 5 tasks listed for that job?

As an HR manager, which skills do you think will be in demand for this position? What would you look for in a candidate?

As someone applying for the position, what training or professional development opportunities would you consider completing to gain the necessary skills?

Job Interview

Chapter 6 describes experience-based situational interview questions in which a candidate must describe how he or she handled a specific type of situation (see table 6.2 for examples).

please consider and source the information from chapters 6,7, and 8 of the following book

Imagine you received a promotion and were going to interview candidates to replace you in role searched above. Consider the answers to the question above and address the following:

Describe 4 experience-based situational interview questions you might ask each candidate.

Explain what would you expect to learn about the candidate from their response to each question.

Explain why it is important as the hiring manager to know what you expect to learn from these questions?

RUBRIC

Excellent Quality

95-100%

Introduction

45-41 points

The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned.

Literature Support

91-84 points

The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned.

Methodology

58-53 points

Content is well-organized with headings for each slide and bulleted lists to group related material as needed. Use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. to enhance readability and presentation content is excellent. Length requirements of 10 slides/pages or less is met.

Average Score

50-85%

40-38 points

More depth/detail for the background and significance is needed, or the research detail is not clear. No search history information is provided.

83-76 points

Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is little integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are included. Summary of information presented is included. Conclusion may not contain a biblical integration.

52-49 points

Content is somewhat organized, but no structure is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. is occasionally detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met.

Poor Quality

0-45%

37-1 points

The background and/or significance are missing. No search history information is provided.

75-1 points

Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is no integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are not included in the summary of information presented. Conclusion does not contain a biblical integration.

48-1 points

There is no clear or logical organizational structure. No logical sequence is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects etc. is often detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met