Order ID:89JHGSJE83839 | Style:APA/MLA/Harvard/Chicago | Pages:5-10 |
Instructions:
Upward Social Mobility Sociology Discussion Paper
Also, in this day and age it is not mainly of what you know but who you know. All this comes with opportunities that come with your parents social class. The middle and working class, do not make the capital that the upper classes do , and they can not get governmental assistance as the lower class. That is another reason why they become stagnant and when they can go to school, they are in debt for the rest of their lives.
My social mobility would be affected if I decide to go for my master and I’m not able to pay for it, which would lead to me staying in the same position, but I do think my connection and resources will help me at this point, and I won’t give up until I get to where I want to be.
People who are in the middle are stuck in the middle due to “the number of jobs at the bottom and the top of the pay scale increasing, while the number of jobs in the middle isn’t. If there were more employment growth in the middle, those who start out at the bottom might have a better shot at moving up.”
There are people who do break free from their parents economic status, but there are more people who do not. The way social structure will affect my future is it will help me move forward. My parents did not go to college and they don’t have the highest paying job, but my parents did encourage and push me to go to college so I can live a better life than they did.
Upward Social Mobility Sociology Discussion Paper
RUBRIC |
||||||
Excellent Quality 95-100%
|
Introduction
45-41 points The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned. |
Literature Support 91-84 points The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned. |
Methodology 58-53 points Content is well-organized with headings for each slide and bulleted lists to group related material as needed. Use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. to enhance readability and presentation content is excellent. Length requirements of 10 slides/pages or less is met. |
|||
Average Score 50-85% |
40-38 points More depth/detail for the background and significance is needed, or the research detail is not clear. No search history information is provided. |
83-76 points Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is little integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are included. Summary of information presented is included. Conclusion may not contain a biblical integration. |
52-49 points Content is somewhat organized, but no structure is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. is occasionally detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met. |
|||
Poor Quality 0-45% |
37-1 points The background and/or significance are missing. No search history information is provided. |
75-1 points Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is no integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are not included in the summary of information presented. Conclusion does not contain a biblical integration. |
48-1 points There is no clear or logical organizational structure. No logical sequence is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects etc. is often detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met |
|||
![]() |
![]() |
|||||
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
||||
You Can Also Place the Order at www.collegepaper.us/orders/ordernow or www.crucialessay.com/orders/ordernow
Upward Social Mobility Sociology Discussion Paper |
Upward Social Mobility Sociology Discussion Paper