Order ID:89JHGSJE83839 | Style:APA/MLA/Harvard/Chicago | Pages:5-10 |
Instructions:
Using renewable energy to mine bitcoin
Paper details:
My current research paper I have done is going to make me fail, i need help to pass. I need a literature review, methodology/investigation, data analysis. 1. Bitcoin mining rigs and how much power is needed to mine for bitcoin throughout the year and how much bitcoin will be mined. 2. Solar energy analysis and how much potentially could be produced using previous years weather data which i will provide. with checks. 3. Wind energy analysis from previous years weather data, same as solar energy. 4. Battery storage needed as the mining rig needs to be operational 24/7. 5. Cost analysis of everything, solar panels, wind turbines , mining rigs etc and compare it with our local power tariffs which i will provide. My research that i have done and that needs editing is called Cassim MR. The power tariffs are not being uploaded so will have to email it to you. I habe uploaded as a word document what my lecturer requires please see that. My lecturer is under the impression that i am going to fail so the level of the assignment should not be a distinction but just enough to get a 55%.
RUBRIC |
||||||
Excellent Quality 95-100%
|
Introduction
45-41 points The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned. |
Literature Support 91-84 points The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned. |
Methodology 58-53 points Content is well-organized with headings for each slide and bulleted lists to group related material as needed. Use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. to enhance readability and presentation content is excellent. Length requirements of 10 slides/pages or less is met. |
|||
Average Score 50-85% |
40-38 points More depth/detail for the background and significance is needed, or the research detail is not clear. No search history information is provided. |
83-76 points Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is little integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are included. Summary of information presented is included. Conclusion may not contain a biblical integration. |
52-49 points Content is somewhat organized, but no structure is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. is occasionally detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met. |
|||
Poor Quality 0-45% |
37-1 points The background and/or significance are missing. No search history information is provided. |
75-1 points Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is no integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are not included in the summary of information presented. Conclusion does not contain a biblical integration. |
48-1 points There is no clear or logical organizational structure. No logical sequence is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects etc. is often detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met |
|||
You Can Also Place the Order at www.collegepaper.us/orders/ordernow or www.crucialessay.com/orders/ordernow |
Using renewable energy to mine bitcoin