Order ID:89JHGSJE83839 | Style:APA/MLA/Harvard/Chicago | Pages:5-10 |
Instructions:
Using Theory to Frame the Research Topic Discussion
Using theory to frame the research topic and question
In 1–2 paragraphs, describe, then compare and contrast, two theories that could be used to frame your research topic. Include the basic underlying assumptions and key terms associated with each theory. Then, in a separate paragraph, use each theory to rewrite your research question or otherwise explain how the theory could be used to frame the research question.
Include at least five sources to support the assertions made in this discussion.
Social Work Developing Skills Questions
I’m working on a social science discussion question and need an explanation and answer to help me learn.
Give an example of how you might open an initial meeting with an individual client and with a family.
How might you deal with differences between you and your client? For example, race, age, gender identity, religion, sexual orientation, ability, nationality, etc.
How would you connect or begin to establish rapport with someone who is different than you?
How does respect play a role during the first and subsequent meetings with a client?
How would you end the first meeting? Why?
How might you begin a second meeting with a client? Why?
How would you close the second meeting (and subsequent meetings)? Why?
Using Theory to Frame the Research Topic Discussion
RUBRIC |
||||||
Excellent Quality 95-100%
|
Introduction
45-41 points The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned. |
Literature Support 91-84 points The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned. |
Methodology 58-53 points Content is well-organized with headings for each slide and bulleted lists to group related material as needed. Use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. to enhance readability and presentation content is excellent. Length requirements of 10 slides/pages or less is met. |
|||
Average Score 50-85% |
40-38 points More depth/detail for the background and significance is needed, or the research detail is not clear. No search history information is provided. |
83-76 points Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is little integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are included. Summary of information presented is included. Conclusion may not contain a biblical integration. |
52-49 points Content is somewhat organized, but no structure is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. is occasionally detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met. |
|||
Poor Quality 0-45% |
37-1 points The background and/or significance are missing. No search history information is provided. |
75-1 points Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is no integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are not included in the summary of information presented. Conclusion does not contain a biblical integration. |
48-1 points There is no clear or logical organizational structure. No logical sequence is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects etc. is often detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met |
|||
You Can Also Place the Order at www.collegepaper.us/orders/ordernow or www.crucialessay.com/orders/ordernow
Using Theory to Frame the Research Topic Discussion |
Using Theory to Frame the Research Topic Discussion