Order ID:89JHGSJE83839 | Style:APA/MLA/Harvard/Chicago | Pages:5-10 |
Instructions:
Dissertation requirements:
Content: Valuation analysis of company (BHP)
Make a table based on the data (for example, discount cash flow) to analyse the situation of BHP in one country
Need to include comparison with other companies in the same industry
The total number of words is 4000?5000 (when data, tables, etc. are not included)
The instructor recommends writing in accordance with the document “6.8 Example”. There are also “7.7example” and “Sample Valuation”, you can also refer to them.
“Gounpou… Company” refers to the writing direction of the thesis, you can refer to it.
The first page of the thesis page, in “From… template”.
References at least 15
Meeting content with supervisor:
1st time – brief introduction with each other
2nd time – see the content of the recommended type of article:
analysis report,
credit rating agents,
media news,
sector reports (Mintel report)
Look at all the contents marked red 4, 4* in the “ABS208list” excel file
Suggestions on the source of the information:
Google scholar,
academic articles,
working papers (www.ssrn.com),
words (https://wrds-www.wharton.upenn.edu/login/),
Orbis (Bureau Van Dijk
3rd time – the content of the paper is required to be completed, for example:
forecasted cash flows,
Free cash flow to firm,
Discounted cash flows DCF,
Create the tables,
Write the methodology,
Write the analysis,
write a small literature review,
write the conclusion,
write the introduction.
4th – 08.02 first draft
Note: Discount cashflow requires calculating the history of the first 5 years and the forecast of the next 5 years based on the data.
There are multiple analysis methods, that is, other analysis methods are needed besides the DCF method. Data analysis after completing the form is the key point. The last part should include your own evaluation of this paper, and you need to express your objective feelings, good aspects, bad aspects, excellent places, and bad places based on your own company’s analysis.
(Reference link for other analysis methods given by the instructor:
https://www.journals.elsevier.com/international-journal-of-forecasting
https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2214845021000569
https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1755534520300476
https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S030142071830374X
https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0378426616301352
https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0377221714009898?
RUBRIC |
||||||
Excellent Quality 95-100%
|
Introduction
45-41 points The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned. |
Literature Support 91-84 points The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned. |
Methodology 58-53 points Content is well-organized with headings for each slide and bulleted lists to group related material as needed. Use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. to enhance readability and presentation content is excellent. Length requirements of 10 slides/pages or less is met. |
|||
Average Score 50-85% |
40-38 points More depth/detail for the background and significance is needed, or the research detail is not clear. No search history information is provided. |
83-76 points Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is little integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are included. Summary of information presented is included. Conclusion may not contain a biblical integration. |
52-49 points Content is somewhat organized, but no structure is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. is occasionally detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met. |
|||
Poor Quality 0-45% |
37-1 points The background and/or significance are missing. No search history information is provided. |
75-1 points Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is no integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are not included in the summary of information presented. Conclusion does not contain a biblical integration. |
48-1 points There is no clear or logical organizational structure. No logical sequence is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects etc. is often detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met |
|||
You Can Also Place the Order at www.collegepaper.us/orders/ordernow or www.crucialessay.com/orders/ordernow |
Valuation analysis of company