Order ID:89JHGSJE83839 | Style:APA/MLA/Harvard/Chicago | Pages:5-10 |
Instructions:
1.Explain how Thompson discusses the “switch” and “bridge” versions of the Trolley Problem. Explain and assess Thompson’s viewpoint, and then make your own case for or against utilitarianism. Consider and reply to any potential complaints.
2.Should coronavirus vaccinations be available on a free market in addition to the present priority system? Make a utilitarian case for it, as well as a non-utilitarian case against it. Is there a case for it that isn’t utilitarian? Make a case for yourself. Make your principled foundation clear. Make sure to evaluate and respond to any potential complaints.
3. How can a government distribute its money currency to the general public? Why, from a moral standpoint, should a government take its own money in payment of fees, fines, or taxes that are legally owed to it? What would a utilitarian say in response to this question? What might a non-response utilitarian’s be? Give examples of why you believe one response is superior to the others.
Versions of the Trolley Problem and the Use of the Free Market in Coronavirus Vaccines Essay
RUBRIC |
||||||
Excellent Quality 95-100%
|
Introduction
45-41 points The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned. |
Literature Support 91-84 points The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned. |
Methodology 58-53 points Content is well-organized with headings for each slide and bulleted lists to group related material as needed. Use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. to enhance readability and presentation content is excellent. Length requirements of 10 slides/pages or less is met. |
|||
Average Score 50-85% |
40-38 points More depth/detail for the background and significance is needed, or the research detail is not clear. No search history information is provided. |
83-76 points Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is little integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are included. Summary of information presented is included. Conclusion may not contain a biblical integration. |
52-49 points Content is somewhat organized, but no structure is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. is occasionally detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met. |
|||
Poor Quality 0-45% |
37-1 points The background and/or significance are missing. No search history information is provided. |
75-1 points Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is no integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are not included in the summary of information presented. Conclusion does not contain a biblical integration. |
48-1 points There is no clear or logical organizational structure. No logical sequence is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects etc. is often detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met |
|||
You Can Also Place the Order at www.collegepaper.us/orders/ordernow or www.crucialessay.com/orders/ordernow
Versions of the Trolley Problem and the Use of the Free Market in Coronavirus Vaccines Essay |
Versions of the Trolley Problem and the Use of the Free Market in Coronavirus Vaccines Essay