Videography on Paradigms and Truisms Case Study Easy
Order ID:89JHGSJE83839 Style:APA/MLA/Harvard/Chicago Pages:5-10 Instructions:
Videography on Paradigms and Truisms Case Study Easy
Videography. Please share your paradigms and truisms here for next week.
Please share your paradigms and truisms here for next week.
Based on all the projects and experiments you have done, or concerns and big questions you have in your work, define your paradigm. You will need to develop this using the 6 criteria that briefly talked about last class. Get abstract and push the concepts so that they produce a “crisis;” remember this is speculative to some extent, best asked in the form of a “what if….” question. Speculate about how your claim could exceed your current practice. Write it down as a phrase or action-based process. What is the big picture we are getting from your practice?
The six criteria for a paradigm are:
it produces a crisis – a rupture
It is not necessarily true
3.it must be exemplary
sufficiently unprecedented
open ended with lots of problems
joins other fields or what we thought to be a very unrelated problem
15-20 Truisms
and here is the example
Hey everyone,
Truisms and my Paradigm are included in Microsoft Word doc below. Please feel free to leave comments and thoughts, very curious to hear from everyone:)
RUBRIC
Excellent Quality
95-100%
Introduction 45-41 points
The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned.
Literature Support
91-84 points
The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned.
Methodology
58-53 points
Content is well-organized with headings for each slide and bulleted lists to group related material as needed. Use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. to enhance readability and presentation content is excellent. Length requirements of 10 slides/pages or less is met.
Average Score
50-85%
40-38 points
More depth/detail for the background and significance is needed, or the research detail is not clear. No search history information is provided.
83-76 points
Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is little integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are included. Summary of information presented is included. Conclusion may not contain a biblical integration.
52-49 points
Content is somewhat organized, but no structure is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. is occasionally detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met.
Poor Quality
0-45%
37-1 points
The background and/or significance are missing. No search history information is provided.
75-1 points
Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is no integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are not included in the summary of information presented. Conclusion does not contain a biblical integration.
48-1 points
There is no clear or logical organizational structure. No logical sequence is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects etc. is often detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met
You Can Also Place the Order at www.collegepaper.us/orders/ordernow or www.crucialessay.com/orders/ordernow Videography on Paradigms and Truisms Case Study Easy
Videography on Paradigms and Truisms Case Study Easy