Viking-age Greenland case study assignment
Order ID:89JHGSJE83839 Style:APA/MLA/Harvard/Chicago Pages:5-10 Instructions:
Viking-age Greenland case study assignment
You are living in Viking-age Greenland near Eiriksfjord. Eirik Rauða (The Red) himself has graciously given you land nearby, and you now have a farmstead and a bit of wealth. You hear about Bjarni Herjolfsson’s encounter with new land to the west, but his story is short on details. You want to explore and actually set foot on this new land and perhaps set up a settlement there.
- What supplies would you need for such an expedition in terms of ships, provisions, and items to set up a farmstead?
- Which characters from this week’s sagas (The Saga of the Greenlanders and Eirik the Red’s Saga) would you bring along and why? Bring at least three people. Who would you leave at home and not allow to come and why? Give details about the people you mention.
- How would you go about constructing a farmstead or temporary settlement once you got to the new land? What problems might you face? Use at least three details from this week’s readings.
Consult the guidelines in the syllabus to formulate your answer to this discussion post. There is no word limit; you just need to address each point asked for.
RUBRIC
Excellent Quality
95-100%
Introduction 45-41 points
The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned.
Literature Support
91-84 points
The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned.
Methodology
58-53 points
Content is well-organized with headings for each slide and bulleted lists to group related material as needed. Use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. to enhance readability and presentation content is excellent. Length requirements of 10 slides/pages or less is met.
Average Score
50-85%
40-38 points
More depth/detail for the background and significance is needed, or the research detail is not clear. No search history information is provided.
83-76 points
Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is little integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are included. Summary of information presented is included. Conclusion may not contain a biblical integration.
52-49 points
Content is somewhat organized, but no structure is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. is occasionally detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met.
Poor Quality
0-45%
37-1 points
The background and/or significance are missing. No search history information is provided.
75-1 points
Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is no integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are not included in the summary of information presented. Conclusion does not contain a biblical integration.
48-1 points
There is no clear or logical organizational structure. No logical sequence is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects etc. is often detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met
You Can Also Place the Order at www.collegepaper.us/orders/ordernow or www.crucialessay.com/orders/ordernow Analyze the Water Footprint Results