Order ID:89JHGSJE83839 | Style:APA/MLA/Harvard/Chicago | Pages:5-10 |
Instructions:
Violence and Videogames Bibliography Academic Journals
Please complete an annotated bibliography entry for at least:
3 Scholarly Sources (Academic Journals, Books, etc.)
2 Popular Sources (Newspaper Articles, Magazine Articles, Blogs, YouTube, Twitter, etc.)
Remember, please find at least one of your sources from the class annotated bibliography google doc. (Don’t forget to reference the name of the student from whom you pulled the source.)
Metaphors in Scientific Language Essay
Compose an analytical response (at least 550 words, not including quote) to one of our secondary sources (See this link: HTTPs) in which you do the following:
Reading: Chew, Matthew K., and Manfred D. Laubscher. “Natural Enemies: Metaphor or Misconception?” Science, vol. 301, no. 5629, 2003, pp. 52–53. Link: HTTPs
Paragraph 1 [main goal: summarize the reading]
Who is the audience for this piece of writing?
What is the purpose of this text?
What context is this author writing in?
What questions are guiding them? Then, state what you think are the significant questions the author is using to guide their inquiry and trying to answer in their article.
Paragraph 2 [main goal: present the quote and discuss a key word]
introduce the author by full name [ex: Jon Cohen]
tell your reader the title of the text [ex: “How a Horror Story Haunts Science”]
provide some context about where the quote appears in the text [ex: when summarizing the enduring “myth” of Frankenstein, Cohen writes: “QUOTE”]
provide clear citation immediately after the quote [ex: (Cohen 75).]
provide a brief summary of what the quote says [no more than 2-3 sentences]
You may also consider bringing in other meanings of the word that could shed interesting light on how the author uses it or to enhance your own analysis.
See Hansson’s “Science and Pseudoscience” for a great example of how to integrate definitions into your sentences and how to use the OED to kickstart your own analysis.
Paragraph 3 [main goal: analyze the quote in detail]
Move into more detailed analysis about the passage, focusing on how this specific quote answers one or more of the questions you identified above. This is the most important part of this activity (aim for at least 200 words). Things to consider here:
how do they advance their argumentative purpose in this passage?
what point is this passage making?
what is important, interesting, confusing, or weird about it?
is there more to say about the key word’s significance?
what can you say about the quote that goes beyond the passage or reading and draws on your own ideas?
Paragraph 4 [main goal: discuss questions you thought of while reading/writing]
Finally, list some questions the text prompted for you as you read it and briefly explain: How did the text prompt these questions? How are these questions related to your own interests? What ideas might you be interested in exploring in Essay 1?
Violence and Videogames Bibliography Academic Journals
RUBRIC |
||||||
Excellent Quality 95-100%
|
Introduction
45-41 points The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned. |
Literature Support 91-84 points The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned. |
Methodology 58-53 points Content is well-organized with headings for each slide and bulleted lists to group related material as needed. Use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. to enhance readability and presentation content is excellent. Length requirements of 10 slides/pages or less is met. |
|||
Average Score 50-85% |
40-38 points More depth/detail for the background and significance is needed, or the research detail is not clear. No search history information is provided. |
83-76 points Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is little integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are included. Summary of information presented is included. Conclusion may not contain a biblical integration. |
52-49 points Content is somewhat organized, but no structure is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. is occasionally detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met. |
|||
Poor Quality 0-45% |
37-1 points The background and/or significance are missing. No search history information is provided. |
75-1 points Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is no integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are not included in the summary of information presented. Conclusion does not contain a biblical integration. |
48-1 points There is no clear or logical organizational structure. No logical sequence is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects etc. is often detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met |
|||
You Can Also Place the Order at www.collegepaper.us/orders/ordernow or www.crucialessay.com/orders/ordernow
Violence and Videogames Bibliography Academic Journals |
Violence and Videogames Bibliography Academic Journals