virtual marketplace discussion essay assignment
Order ID:89JHGSJE83839 Style:APA/MLA/Harvard/Chicago Pages:5-10 Instructions:
virtual marketplace discussion essay assignment
It is important to have the client’s meet the contractors. The chatroom is a good inclusion to the website because it will facilitate interaction and place users in a virtual marketplace that simulates the experience in a real life market with bids and offers. I used to like this site when the buyer could meet the seller without the mediator. I hope you can recreate that in the project I sent last time by adding to the list everyone at all the universities I have uploaded in the website database. But that is only after you have reviewed the list of students on the Capella University student list, My UALR student list, and APUS student list. I will later add Columbia College and Central Texas College student list later after you have reviewed the project attached. See previous question.
One more thing. This is for anyone that has sent a bid, and cannot get through to me. Let me know if you can “hangout” with google. I have sent a message to any applicant and bidder. Check your messages.
RUBRIC
Excellent Quality
95-100%
Introduction 45-41 points
The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned.
Literature Support
91-84 points
The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned.
Methodology
58-53 points
Content is well-organized with headings for each slide and bulleted lists to group related material as needed. Use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. to enhance readability and presentation content is excellent. Length requirements of 10 slides/pages or less is met.
Average Score
50-85%
40-38 points
More depth/detail for the background and significance is needed, or the research detail is not clear. No search history information is provided.
83-76 points
Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is little integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are included. Summary of information presented is included. Conclusion may not contain a biblical integration.
52-49 points
Content is somewhat organized, but no structure is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. is occasionally detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met.
Poor Quality
0-45%
37-1 points
The background and/or significance are missing. No search history information is provided.
75-1 points
Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is no integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are not included in the summary of information presented. Conclusion does not contain a biblical integration.
48-1 points
There is no clear or logical organizational structure. No logical sequence is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects etc. is often detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met
You Can Also Place the Order at www.collegepaper.us/orders/ordernow or www.crucialessay.com/orders/ordernow