Vision And Arts- Follow- Up Psychology Assignment
Order ID:89JHGSJE83839 Style:APA/MLA/Harvard/Chicago Pages:5-10
Vision And Arts- Follow- Up Psychology Assignment
- Information: Cognitive biases are a normal phenomenon in our everyday life. They comprise of the various assumptions that we tend to make when we see familiar objects with our naked eyes and our brains interpret it to be what we think they are, even when they are wrong or not real. The video titled “Amazing Anamorphic Illusions!” is an example of just how powerful illusion can be. However, if only we questioned our assumptions, then none of us would be experiencing massive cognitive biases that we always experience in our day-to-day life like we do with the images presented to us in the video. In the above video, we get surprised that the images we are shown and which seem so clear when the camera zooms in on them are actually not what they think they are. For example, when the camera zooms on the picture of the show, at the first glance we are sure that that is actually a shoe sitting on a white paper. However, all this is disapproved when we see a hand turn the paper at an angle of 360 degree. The same can be said of the other anamorphic diagrams in the video like the picture of the duct tape and the Rubik’s cube. In conclusion, the life-like images of the pictures we see led us to the conclusion that what we were seeing were actual physical objects of a shoe, a Rubik’s cube and a duct tape when in actual sense they were just pictures. Such optical illusions can be used to test our rationality when it comes to details with respect to life and how we make judgments. Sometimes what we see is not what it really is. The three most common cognitive biases that always threaten to lead us in making inaccurate conclusions when reasoning out problems we encounter in life include; confirmation and non-confirmation bias, and the belief bias. All these play an important role in the decisions we tend to make in our day to day life.
Comment: Be sure to read previous posts and build on them. Also, try to stay focused on the discussion question. (Rather than discuss cognitive biases, examine the video carefully for the cues that led you to believe this was a real 3D object – like the shadows…)
Read the information and comment, write a respond (50-100words)
- QUESTION 1: The following photographs show real scenes, but they seem unreal. If you follow the links, you can find similar works by the same artist. Carefully examine one of the artist’s works, and then discuss: Why were you confused: What assumption did your visual brain automatically make? Why did your brain have to make an assumption? Why are those assumptions usually valid? How did the artist break that assumption?
Answer: Observing the question mark image, one would get confused because of the two signs; a question mark and an exclamation mark. An individual would not get the exact meaning that is being communicated and for that reason, the confusion comes up. As a result of the question mark within the image, an assumption
that is made by the visual brain is that of danger. In many instances, an exclamation mark stands for danger which happens to be a warning instance on many occasions. The brain is programmed to look at things from a broader perspective as per the way it has been trained. Having had stories of danger or seen the image at a
certain place, then it becomes clear for the brain to make an assumption. A brain would in many instances assume per what the eyes see since it is what is manufactured within the brain. The assumptions are valid because of what is seen or observed. After the eyes observe the images, then it becomes clear that the brain is
working making it easy for assumptions to be made. The artist breaks the assumption by making the exclamation mark bold as compared to the question mark that happens to be faded. The exclamation mark communicates more and it makes the brain to say that there may be a danger.
Comment: The question mark is the shadow of the exclamation mark. How is that possible? The exclamation mark is curved in depth, but you can’t see the 3rd dimension. In this forum we’re discussing how the brain reconstructs this “missing” 3rd dimension, and when this reconstruction might be wrong.
Read the question, answer and comment, write a respond (50-100words)
- Question: Use the background material to explain this illusion. (Use several observations from the background material about what we notice and what we don’t notice about shadows.) If you don’t perceive the illusion, use the link below to see other examples of the hovering illusion.
Answer: There is so much detail in any one single illusion which cannot be easily noticed with the naked eyes. The interesting thing about shadows and illusion such as the Indian Yogi Levitation trick is that different angels are used to present objects in a very new and striking way.
Comment: The Indian Yogi Levitation trick is a different illusion.
Read the question, answer and comment, Rewrite the answer.
- Write an essay about why you find the work visually interesting. Focus on the visual aspects of the work (color, composition, depth, etc.) You haven’t taken the course yet, so I don’t expect you to use art terminology or art concepts. I just expect you to look carefully at the work and then write a brief essay about what you noticed. If this seems vague, watch a couple of the videos listed under #2. To give you an idea of how much to write, aim for 2-3 paragraphs (about 400 words).
Austrian Master. Crucifixion, c. 1400–1420. Tempera and gold on panel, Overall: 18 3/8 x 11 1/8 in. (46.7 x 28.3 cm). BF828. Public Domain.
Content is well-organized with headings for each slide and bulleted lists to group related material as needed. Use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. to enhance readability and presentation content is excellent. Length requirements of 10 slides/pages or less is met.
More depth/detail for the background and significance is needed, or the research detail is not clear. No search history information is provided.
Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is little integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are included. Summary of information presented is included. Conclusion may not contain a biblical integration.
Content is somewhat organized, but no structure is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. is occasionally detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met.
The background and/or significance are missing. No search history information is provided.
Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is no integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are not included in the summary of information presented. Conclusion does not contain a biblical integration.
There is no clear or logical organizational structure. No logical sequence is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects etc. is often detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met
You Can Also Place the Order at www.collegepaper.us/orders/ordernow or www.crucialessay.com/orders/ordernow
Up Psychology Assignment