Visualizing Research Presentation on Cybersecurity Training.
Order ID:89JHGSJE83839 | Style:APA/MLA/Harvard/Chicago | Pages:5-10 |
Instructions:
Visualizing Research Presentation on Cybersecurity Training.
Try to make it visual, not a lot of text, just the most relevant content.
Try to display the most relevant elements, and keep the secondary ones for your explanations.
You can structure it however you need to follow your explanations (you can start thinking about five main parts: Background, Research Question, Methodology, Data collection, Findings and conclusions).
Try to highlight the information that supports the achievement of your research objectives and also the information that supports your conclusions.
A good exercise of personal reflection is detecting the weak and the strong points of your work.
Advice: Do not “copy and paste” the written dissertation. Panel members have had the chance to read it and wish to verify that students can identify key issues.
Students are advised to rehearse the presentation to ensure it is within the time limits established; if it overruns the set time, the Committee has the right to terminate the presentation and important concluding comments may not be allowed.
Visualizing Research Presentation on Cybersecurity Training.
RUBRIC |
||||||
Excellent Quality 95-100%
|
Introduction
45-41 points The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned. |
Literature Support 91-84 points The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned. |
Methodology 58-53 points Content is well-organized with headings for each slide and bulleted lists to group related material as needed. Use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. to enhance readability and presentation content is excellent. Length requirements of 10 slides/pages or less is met. |
|||
Average Score 50-85% |
40-38 points More depth/detail for the background and significance is needed, or the research detail is not clear. No search history information is provided. |
83-76 points Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is little integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are included. Summary of information presented is included. Conclusion may not contain a biblical integration. |
52-49 points Content is somewhat organized, but no structure is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. is occasionally detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met. |
|||
Poor Quality 0-45% |
37-1 points The background and/or significance are missing. No search history information is provided. |
75-1 points Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is no integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are not included in the summary of information presented. Conclusion does not contain a biblical integration. |
48-1 points There is no clear or logical organizational structure. No logical sequence is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects etc. is often detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met |
|||
You Can Also Place the Order at www.collegepaper.us/orders/ordernow or www.crucialessay.com/orders/ordernow |