Order ID: 89JHGSJE83839 | Style: APA/MLA/Harvard/Chicago | Pages: 5-10 |
Instructions:
Please select TWO of the fifty-two sections of “Song of Myself” and analyze them comparatively. Why you chose them? What do they mean to you? Which are the main concerns or ideas of the poet in the particular sections of your choice? How some of these ideas relate to the largest scope of Whitman’s thinking as were discussed in class (and will be further discussed next time), posted in class notes and demonstrated in my Power Point and the documentary (Posted here on BB)?
To demonstrate knowledge of your topic and support your points you must incorporate examples and quotes from all the above sources, including, of course, the poem itself.
Write about 800 words (no less), at least four paragraphs, double spaced and consider ALL rules and characteristics of writing we have discussed repeatedly, all the way from grammar, syntax, structure, to having a title, italics and avoid run on sentences.
Be analytical and have an argument.
https://whitmanarchive.org/published/LG/1891/poems/27
To make it easier you can use the first two poems from the link above.
RUBRIC |
||||||
Excellent Quality 95-100%
|
Introduction
45-41 points The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned. |
Literature Support 91-84 points The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned. |
Methodology 58-53 points Content is well-organized with headings for each slide and bulleted lists to group related material as needed. Use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. to enhance readability and presentation content is excellent. Length requirements of 10 slides/pages or less is met. |
|||
Average Score 50-85% |
40-38 points More depth/detail for the background and significance is needed, or the research detail is not clear. No search history information is provided. |
83-76 points Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is little integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are included. Summary of information presented is included. Conclusion may not contain a biblical integration. |
52-49 points Content is somewhat organized, but no structure is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. is occasionally detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met. |
|||
Poor Quality 0-45% |
37-1 points The background and/or significance are missing. No search history information is provided. |
75-1 points Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is no integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are not included in the summary of information presented. Conclusion does not contain a biblical integration.
|
48-1 points There is no clear or logical organizational structure. No logical sequence is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects etc. is often detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met |
|||
You Can Also Place the Order at www.perfectacademic.com/orders/ordernow or www.crucialessay.com/orders/ordernow |