Order ID:89JHGSJE83839 | Style:APA/MLA/Harvard/Chicago | Pages:5-10 |
Instructions:
WBS for Vulnerability and Threat Assessment The SoW report provided a quick summary of the organization’s essential aspects as well as a list of the organization’s security needs in the previous step. You’re now ready to create a detailed job breakdown framework (WBS).
Because this breakdown is more detailed, you’ll need to come up with instances of practices you could recommend to your company. A penetration test, baseline analysis, or system logging are some examples. Make a list of the tools and techniques you’ll need to conduct a vulnerability assessment later on in the project.
Create a detailed task breakdown structure in a spreadsheet, containing critical parts that must be tested and assessed. Internal threats: personnel, policies, and procedures external threats: systems, connectivity, databases existing security measures: software, hardware, telecommunications, cloud resources compliance requirements: legal aspects (federal, state, and local), contractual demands up and down the su The second section of the final vulnerability assessment report will be this plan.
RUBRIC |
||||||
Excellent Quality 95-100%
|
Introduction
45-41 points The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned. |
Literature Support 91-84 points The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned. |
Methodology 58-53 points Content is well-organized with headings for each slide and bulleted lists to group related material as needed. Use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. to enhance readability and presentation content is excellent. Length requirements of 10 slides/pages or less is met. |
|||
Average Score 50-85% |
40-38 points More depth/detail for the background and significance is needed, or the research detail is not clear. No search history information is provided. |
83-76 points Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is little integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are included. Summary of information presented is included. Conclusion may not contain a biblical integration. |
52-49 points Content is somewhat organized, but no structure is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. is occasionally detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met. |
|||
Poor Quality 0-45% |
37-1 points The background and/or significance are missing. No search history information is provided. |
75-1 points Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is no integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are not included in the summary of information presented. Conclusion does not contain a biblical integration. |
48-1 points There is no clear or logical organizational structure. No logical sequence is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects etc. is often detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met |
|||
You Can Also Place the Order at www.collegepaper.us/orders/ordernow or www.crucialessay.com/orders/ordernow |
WBS for Vulnerability and Threat Assessment