Week 11 Public Healthcare Leadership Paper
Order ID:89JHGSJE83839 Style:APA/MLA/Harvard/Chicago Pages:5-10 Instructions:
Week 11 Public Healthcare Leadership Paper
Public health problems are generally complex as many involve a series of causes that may directly pose a specific health threat. As a result, special challenges await public health leaders and leaders must be ready to address such challenges with efficiency and effectiveness. Therefore, a developed personal, public health leadership theory may assist leaders with a framework which highlights leadership perspectives for use in the field. As practitioners of the theory, you may be able to focus more directly on development, implementation, and evaluation of public health solutions to health problems and crises affecting society.
This week, you finalize your personal Public Health Leadership Theory. With a blended understanding of various leadership perspectives learned in this course, your development of a leadership theory with attention to present gaps in the literature may provide a necessary framework for future best practices in the field.
Learning Objectives
Students will:
Apply leadership perspectives to the development of a personal Public Health Leadership Theory
Apply research methods to the design of an evaluation plan
Learning Resources
Required Readings
Nahavandi, A. (2014). The art and science of leadership (7th ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson.
Chapter 1, “Definition and Significance of Leadership”
Chapter 6, “Current Era in Leadership”
Chapter 7, “Other Leadership Perspectives”
Chapter 9, “Leading Change”
Chapter 10, “Developing Leaders”
Koh, H. (2009). Fostering public health leadership. Journal of Public Health, 31(2), 199–201.
Document: Doctoral Study Template (Word document)
Note: You will use this template to complete the Scholar-Practitioner Project.
Project: Scholar-Practitioner Project: Public Health Leadership Theory
For your final written assignment, you refine and develop your Public Health Leadership Theory based on leadership theories and a systems approach learned in this course. For this Assignment, your theory should reflect Instructor feedback, researched studies, introspection, innovation, and literature analysis.
The Assignment (15–20 pages):
Section 1 — Abstract and Introduction (1–2 pages)
Section 2 — Revised Literature Review and Problem Statement (5–7 pages):
Literature Review to include:
A synthesis of the literature of 15–20 peer reviewed, scholarly resources
A description of theoretical gaps in the research
Problem Statement to include:
Section 3 — Personal Public Health Leadership Theory (2–3 pages):
An articulation of your personal Public Health Leadership Theory
Section 4 — Revised Visual Representation of Your Public Health Leadership Theory (3–4 pages):
Your visual representation should include:
Your personal Public Health Leadership Theory to address the gaps identified in the literature
A visual representation of the theory (e.g. table, graph, matrix)
A explanation on how the theory addresses the literature gap identified in Week 5
A description of how your theory incorporates aspects of systems thinking
Section 5 — Empirical Evaluation Plan for a Public Health Leadership Theory (3–4 pages):
You will assess if the newly developed leadership theory addresses the problem you have been working on. What methodological steps will you use? How will you collect data? Suggestion – start with how theories in our text are evaluated. It does not have to be detailed, but it must include the methods, measures and analytic techniques.
If the assignments are done correctly, there should be an alignment from the topic of choice to the evaluation:
The topic is researched in the literature
The literature review points out a theoretical gap that needs to be addressed by leadership
The gap is turned into a problem statement
A leadership theory to address the problem proposed
The theory is depicted in a visual; and finally
An evaluation plan describes how the newly developed theory resolves the problem identified in the literature
To further help, examples (Two final projects – permission given to post) are located in the Doc Sharing area for this week
Section 6 — Conclusion (1–2 pages)
Section 7 — References
An APA-formatted reference list of 15–20 peer-reviewed, scholarly journals
By Day 7
Submit your Scholar-Practitioner Project.
Submission and Grading Information
To submit your completed Project for review and grading, do the following:
Please save your Project using the naming convention “WK11Proj+last name+first initial.(extension)” as the name.
Click the Scholar-Practictioner Project Rubric to review the Grading Criteria for the Assignment.
Click the Week 11 Project link. You will also be able to “View Rubric” for grading criteria from this area.
Next, from the Attach File area, click on the Browse My Computer button. Find the document you saved as “WK11Proj+last name+first initial.(extension)” and click Open.
If applicable: From the Plagiarism Tools area, click the checkbox for I agree to submit my paper(s) to the Global Reference Database.
Click on the Submit button to complete your submission.
Grading Criteria
To access your rubric:
Scholar-Practictioner Project Rubric
Check Your Project Draft for Authenticity
To check your Project draft for authenticity:
Submit your Week 11 Project draft and review the originality report.
Submit Your Project by Day 7
To submit your Project:
Week 11 Project
Week 11 Public Healthcare Leadership Paper
RUBRIC
Excellent Quality
95-100%
Introduction 45-41 points
The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned.
Literature Support
91-84 points
The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned.
Methodology
58-53 points
Content is well-organized with headings for each slide and bulleted lists to group related material as needed. Use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. to enhance readability and presentation content is excellent. Length requirements of 10 slides/pages or less is met.
Average Score
50-85%
40-38 points
More depth/detail for the background and significance is needed, or the research detail is not clear. No search history information is provided.
83-76 points
Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is little integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are included. Summary of information presented is included. Conclusion may not contain a biblical integration.
52-49 points
Content is somewhat organized, but no structure is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. is occasionally detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met.
Poor Quality
0-45%
37-1 points
The background and/or significance are missing. No search history information is provided.
75-1 points
Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is no integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are not included in the summary of information presented. Conclusion does not contain a biblical integration.
48-1 points
There is no clear or logical organizational structure. No logical sequence is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects etc. is often detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met
You Can Also Place the Order at www.collegepaper.us/orders/ordernow or www.crucialessay.com/orders/ordernow