Week 5 Community Teaching Plan Teaching Experience Paper

Week 5 Community Teaching Plan Teaching Experience Paper

Instructions:

Week 5 Community Teaching Plan Teaching Experience Paper

Community Teaching Plan: Teaching Experience Paper

The RN to BSN program at Grand Canyon University meets the requirements for clinical competencies as defined by the Commission on Collegiate Nursing Education (CCNE) and the American Association of Colleges of Nursing (AACN), using nontraditional experiences for practicing nurses. These experiences come in the form of direct and indirect care experiences in which licensed nursing students engage in learning within the context of their hospital organization, specific care discipline, and local communities. Week 5 Community Teaching Plan Teaching Experience Paper

describe the teaching experience and discuss your observations.

Summary of teaching plan

Epidemiological rationale for topic

Evaluation of teaching experience

Community response to teaching

Areas of strengths and areas of improvement

CNUAS Health IT Project Management Discussion

Week Three: Discussion – Health IT Project Management

Must post first.

Subscribe

You are on the project team, and it is time to get IT done.

Good news – The Board has decided to start four proof-of-concept projects focused on priority stakeholders.

The next step is to develop initial project teams and plans. Create some key bullet points and text summarizing your proposed project game plan. Choose one or more of the following stakeholder engagement areas.

Project for the patients

Project for clinical staff

Project for financial sustainability

Project for public health

Consider people, processes, and products.

Realize that success is not only getting IT all to work yet working for all the stakeholders in complex dynamic, connected health ecosystems.

Share some plan highlights on requirements/design, development, implementation/adoption, and evaluation/optimization.

Process – Consider classic PMBOK (project mgmt body of knowledge) – phases to initiate, plan, execute, monitor, and close. Also, consider more agile and iterative approaches with ongoing optimization incorporating ongoing stakeholder input, such as Agile or others. Finally, don’t forget ways to engage people and celebrate success metrics achieved/progress/advancement!

Reference – applicable course readings/resources and add relevance from the discovery lab to strengthen your credibility.

Engage – with your classmate colleagues to strengthen your position and address opposition.

Week 5 Community Teaching Plan Teaching Experience Paper

RUBRIC
Excellent Quality 95-100%	Introduction 45-41 points The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned.		Literature Support 91-84  points The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned.			Methodology 58-53 points Content is well-organized with headings for each slide and bulleted lists to group related material as needed. Use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. to enhance readability and presentation content is excellent. Length requirements of 10 slides/pages or less is met.
Average Score 50-85%	40-38 points More depth/detail for the background and significance is needed, or the research detail is not clear. No search history information is provided.		83-76  points Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is little integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are included. Summary of information presented is included. Conclusion may not contain a biblical integration.			52-49  points Content is somewhat organized, but no structure is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. is occasionally detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met.
Poor Quality 0-45%	37-1 points The background and/or significance are missing. No search history information is provided.		75-1 points Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is no integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are not included in the summary of information presented. Conclusion does not contain a biblical integration.			48-1 points There is no clear or logical organizational structure. No logical sequence is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects etc. is often detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met
You Can Also Place the Order at www.collegepaper.us/orders/ordernow or www.crucialessay.com/orders/ordernow

PLACE THE ORDER WITH US TODAY AND GET A PERFECT SCORE!!!