What are the best ways to organize the structure of a proposal
Order ID:89JHGSJE83839 Style:APA/MLA/Harvard/Chicago Pages:5-10 Instructions:
What are the best ways to organize the structure of a proposal
Introduction: This section should briefly introduce the problem or opportunity, the proposed solution, and the main benefits of the proposal.
Background and Problem Statement: This section should provide more detailed information about the problem or opportunity and explain why it is important.
Proposed Solution: This section should present the proposed solution in detail, including any relevant data or research that supports it.
Implementation Plan: This section should describe how the proposed solution will be implemented, including a detailed timeline and any resources needed.
Evaluation and Monitoring: This section should describe how the proposal’s success will be measured and monitored.
Conclusion: This section should summarize the main points of the proposal, restate the benefits, and make a strong call to action.
References: This section should list any sources cited in the proposal.
It is also important to use clear and concise language, and to format the proposal in a professional and easy-to-read manner.
What are the best ways to organize the structure of a proposal
RUBRIC
Excellent Quality
95-100%
Introduction 45-41 points
The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned.
Literature Support
91-84 points
The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned.
Methodology
58-53 points
Content is well-organized with headings for each slide and bulleted lists to group related material as needed. Use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. to enhance readability and presentation content is excellent. Length requirements of 10 slides/pages or less is met.
Average Score
50-85%
40-38 points
More depth/detail for the background and significance is needed, or the research detail is not clear. No search history information is provided.
83-76 points
Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is little integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are included. Summary of information presented is included. Conclusion may not contain a biblical integration.
52-49 points
Content is somewhat organized, but no structure is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. is occasionally detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met.
Poor Quality
0-45%
37-1 points
The background and/or significance are missing. No search history information is provided.
75-1 points
Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is no integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are not included in the summary of information presented. Conclusion does not contain a biblical integration.
48-1 points
There is no clear or logical organizational structure. No logical sequence is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects etc. is often detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met
You Can Also Place the Order at www.collegepaper.us/orders/ordernow or www.crucialessay.com/orders/ordernow