Order ID:89JHGSJE83839 | Style:APA/MLA/Harvard/Chicago | Pages:5-10 |
Instructions:
Wk. 6 Socio Ecological Framework Obesity Discussion
Apply the social ecological model (SEM) to the health issue of obesity. Describe factors associated with obesity at the individual, interpersonal, institutional/organizational, community, and social/policy levels. Which of the factors you identified do you think would be the most challenging to address? Why?
PLEASE ANSWER ALL QUESTIONS IN THEIR INDIVIDUAL PARAGRAPHS AND MAKE IT COHESIVE AND TRY TO INCORPORATE THE READINGS BELOW
PLEASE add the links/sites below to the reference list if you use any of these readings and make sure everything is in proper APA format.
https://apastyle.apa.org/learn/quick-guide-on-refe…
Read Chapter 3 in Health Behavior: Theory, Research, and Practice.
URL:
Read “Social Ecological Model,” located on the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) website.
URL:
https://www.cdc.gov/cancer/crccp/sem.htm
Read “The Social-Ecological Model: A Framework for Prevention,” located on the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) website.
URL:
https://www.cdc.gov/violenceprevention/overview/social-ecologicalmodel.html
Read “Applying the Ecological Model of Behavior Change to a Physical Activity Trial in Retirement Communities: Description of the Study Protocol,” by Kerr et al., from Contemporary Clinical Trials (2012).
URL:
http://www.sciencedirect.com.lopes.idm.oclc.org/science/article/pii/S1551714412001991
Read “Developing and Applying a Socio-Ecological Model to the Promotion of Healthy Eating in the School,” by Townsend and Foster, from Public Health Nutrition (2011).
URL:
Read “Translating the Socio-Ecological Perspective into Multilevel Interventions: Gaps Between Theory and Practice,” by Schölmerich and Kawachi, from Health Education and Behavior (2016).
URL:
http://journals.sagepub.com/doi/pdf/10.1177/1090198115605309
Read “Bridging the Gaps: An Early Integrated Support Collaborative for at Risk Mothers in Rural Maine,” by Morton, Withers, Konrad, Buterbaugh, and Spence, from Work: A Journal of Prevention Assessment and Rehabilitation (2015).
URL:
Read “Prevention of Unhealthy Weight in Children by Promoting Physical Activity Using a Socio-Ecological Approach: What Can We Learn from Intervention Studies?” by Kellou, Sandalinas, Copin, and Simon, from Diabetes and Metabolism (2014).
Wk. 6 Socio Ecological Framework Obesity Discussion
RUBRIC |
||||||
Excellent Quality 95-100%
|
Introduction
45-41 points The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned. |
Literature Support 91-84 points The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned. |
Methodology 58-53 points Content is well-organized with headings for each slide and bulleted lists to group related material as needed. Use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. to enhance readability and presentation content is excellent. Length requirements of 10 slides/pages or less is met. |
|||
Average Score 50-85% |
40-38 points More depth/detail for the background and significance is needed, or the research detail is not clear. No search history information is provided. |
83-76 points Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is little integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are included. Summary of information presented is included. Conclusion may not contain a biblical integration. |
52-49 points Content is somewhat organized, but no structure is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. is occasionally detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met. |
|||
Poor Quality 0-45% |
37-1 points The background and/or significance are missing. No search history information is provided. |
75-1 points Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is no integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are not included in the summary of information presented. Conclusion does not contain a biblical integration. |
48-1 points There is no clear or logical organizational structure. No logical sequence is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects etc. is often detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met |
|||
You Can Also Place the Order at www.collegepaper.us/orders/ordernow or www.crucialessay.com/orders/ordernow
|