Instructions:<\/strong><\/span><\/p>\n Journalism and News Practices Around Marginalized People Poster<\/p>\n Analyze current international media cultures, journalism and news practices, or media communication around marginalized peoples using a critical comparative research perspective. And I will upload three comparative research methods, you will choose one of them to make this assignment.<\/p>\n The project elements should include:<\/p>\n Introductory text (500-1000 words, pdf format):<\/p>\n lists the poster title and author\u2019s student identification number ONLY (no names),<\/p>\n introduces the comparative media project,<\/p>\n outlines research topic, main argument, and analysis of findings,<\/p>\n points to media examples or case studies,<\/p>\n Journalism and News Practices Around Marginalized People Poster<\/p>\n explains that contents of the poster,<\/p>\n provides reference list.<\/p>\n Poster (I will upload the template, portrait\/landscape, 500-1000 words, pdf format):<\/p>\n A poster is a visual communication tool that serves as a source of information; conversation starter; and a snapshot of your research.<\/p>\n The poster should provoke discussion about comparative G-South media research.<\/p>\n The poster should be informative and visually appealing.<\/p>\n The poster should include voices from the global South<\/p>\n The text should be easily read.<\/p>\n The poster formats :<\/p>\n Branding:<\/p>\n To keep all posters consistent with branding: use logos as provided, all headings and sub-headings in Ariel font, and all body text in Calibri font.<\/p>\n Text size recommendations when using template:<\/p>\n Main heading \u2013 Ariel, size 55<\/p>\n Sub-headings \u2013 Ariel, size 35<\/p>\n Body text \u2013 Calibri, size 32<\/p>\n Author name(s), Degree\/Unit of study (MECO6926 International Media Practice) Calibri Bold, size 26<\/p>\n To test the feasibility of your preferred research topic, list the resources you found to support your project design should include:<\/p>\n three journal articles: \u2026<\/p>\n two websites: \u2026<\/p>\n one image or video: \u2026<\/p>\n Reading lists (must read):<\/p>\n https:\/\/www.jstor.org\/stable\/j.ctv65sxh2<\/a><\/p>\n https:\/\/onlinelibrary.wiley.com\/doi\/abs\/10.1111\/co…<\/a><\/p>\n RUBRIC<\/strong><\/span><\/p>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n Excellent Quality<\/span><\/strong><\/p>\n 95-100%<\/span><\/p>\n \n<\/td>\n 45-41 points<\/span><\/p>\n The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned.<\/span><\/td>\n Literature Support<\/strong><\/span><\/p>\n 91-84 \u00a0points<\/span><\/p>\n The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned.<\/span><\/p>\n<\/td>\n Methodology<\/strong><\/span><\/p>\n 58-53 points<\/span><\/p>\n Content is well-organized with headings for each slide and bulleted lists to group related material as needed. Use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. to enhance readability and presentation content is excellent. Length requirements of 10 slides\/pages or less is met.<\/span><\/p>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n Average Score<\/strong><\/span><\/p>\n 50-85%<\/span><\/p>\n<\/td>\n 40-38 points<\/span><\/p>\n More depth\/detail for the background and significance is needed, or the research detail is not clear. No search history information is provided.<\/span><\/p>\n<\/td>\n 83-76 \u00a0points<\/span><\/p>\n Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is little integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are included. Summary of information presented is included. Conclusion may not contain a biblical integration.<\/span><\/p>\n<\/td>\n 52-49 \u00a0points<\/span><\/p>\n Content is somewhat organized, but no structure is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. is occasionally detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met.<\/span><\/p>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n Poor Quality<\/strong><\/span><\/p>\n 0-45%<\/span><\/p>\n<\/td>\n 37-1 points<\/span><\/p>\n The background and\/or significance are missing. No search history information is provided.<\/span><\/p>\n<\/td>\n 75-1 points<\/span><\/p>\n Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is no integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are not included in the summary of information presented. Conclusion does not contain a biblical integration.<\/span><\/p>\n<\/td>\n 48-1 points<\/span><\/p>\n There is no clear or logical organizational structure. No logical sequence is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects etc. is often detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met<\/span><\/p>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/tbody>\n<\/table>\n Journalism and News Practices Around Marginalized People Poster<\/p>\n\n\n\n\n
\n \n \n \n Introduction<\/strong><\/span><\/p>\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n ![\"Journalism](\"https:\/\/crucialessay.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/05\/A.jpg\")
<\/td>\n![\"\"](\"https:\/\/crucialessay.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/05\/BBBBB.jpg\")
<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n\n ![\"\"](\"https:\/\/crucialessay.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/05\/CCCCCCC.jpg\")
<\/td>\n![\"\"](\"https:\/\/crucialessay.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/05\/HHHHH.jpg\")
<\/td>\n![\"\"](\"https:\/\/crucialessay.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/05\/XXXXXXXXX.jpg\")
<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n\n You Can Also Place the Order at www.collegepaper.us\/orders\/ordernow<\/a><\/span> or www.crucialessay.com\/orders\/ordernow<\/a><\/span><\/p>\n
![\"Simply](\"https:\/\/media.giphy.com\/media\/D3ToICHrnKoCc\/giphy.gif\")
\n\n\t\t \n\t\t ![\"Buy](\"https:\/\/collegepaper.us\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/11\/Order-Custom-Essay-Papers.png\")
<\/a>\n\t\t \n\t\t