Order ID:89JHGSJE83839 | Style:APA/MLA/Harvard/Chicago | Pages:5-10 |
Instructions:
How often do you try to avoid biases toward your own point of view when looking for information on a particular topic?
This task requires you to practice this type of critical thinking.
INSTRUCTIONS
Write a 34 page paper that includes the following:
In your Week 3 assignment, Conflicting Viewpoints Essay: Part 1, state your position on the topic you chose.
Choose three premises (reasons) from the Pros & Cons of Controversial Issues that support your position and explain why you chose these particular reasons.
Explain your answers to the “believing” questions in Pros & Cons of Controversial Issues about the three premises that oppose your position.
Examine at least two types of biases you may have encountered while weighing the arguments for and against your position.
Examine how your own enculturation or sense of belonging to a group may have influenced your biases.
Even if your position on the issue hasn’t changed, discuss whether your thinking about the topic has changed as a result of playing the “Believing Game.”
Guidelines for clear and organized writing should be followed in the paper:
An introductory paragraph and a concluding paragraph should be included.
In body paragraphs, use a topic sentence and supporting sentences to address the main ideas.
Follow basic English grammar, punctuation, mechanics, and spelling rules.
Use four sources to back up your claims. Choose sources that are reliable, timely, and relevant. At least once in your assignment, cite each source listed on your source page. Access the library or consult the library guides for assistance with research, writing, and citation.
RUBRIC |
||||||
Excellent Quality 95-100%
|
Introduction
45-41 points The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned. |
Literature Support 91-84 points The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned. |
Methodology 58-53 points Content is well-organized with headings for each slide and bulleted lists to group related material as needed. Use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. to enhance readability and presentation content is excellent. Length requirements of 10 slides/pages or less is met. |
|||
Average Score 50-85% |
40-38 points More depth/detail for the background and significance is needed, or the research detail is not clear. No search history information is provided. |
83-76 points Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is little integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are included. Summary of information presented is included. Conclusion may not contain a biblical integration. |
52-49 points Content is somewhat organized, but no structure is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. is occasionally detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met. |
|||
Poor Quality 0-45% |
37-1 points The background and/or significance are missing. No search history information is provided. |
75-1 points Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is no integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are not included in the summary of information presented. Conclusion does not contain a biblical integration. |
48-1 points There is no clear or logical organizational structure. No logical sequence is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects etc. is often detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met |
|||
You Can Also Place the Order at www.collegepaper.us/orders/ordernow or www.crucialessay.com/orders/ordernow
Writing a Philosophy Paper on Medical Marijuana |
Writing a Philosophy Paper on Medical Marijuana