Writing A Short Summary of the Text Assignment
Order ID:89JHGSJE83839 Style:APA/MLA/Harvard/Chicago Pages:5-10 Instructions:
Writing A Short Summary of the Text Assignment
STEP 1 Read the text annotating passages that strike you. Annotation means that you write down words that catch your attention – or sentences or passages that interest or confuse you.
You may also make comments if there is something you would like to say in response to the text. You may even want to write a short summary of the text in order to remember the content. For this process to work, you must complete this step while you read the text for the first time. Annotations may be in your textbook.
STEP 2 Make a personal connection with the text. Explain what in your own life the text reminds you of.
STEP 3 Take a few minutes and review the annotations you made. Of the parts of the text you annotated, which are the most powerful?
Make a list of just those words, phrases, sentences or longer passages that particularly resonated with you (annotations may be text you liked or text you strongly disliked).
STEP 4 Now write a short paragraph about the text as a whole. You may confirm, appreciate, argue, express frustration with what the author said, but explain why you feel the way you do.
Your original response should be at least 250 words and include at least 3 direct quotes.
RUBRIC
Excellent Quality
95-100%
Introduction 45-41 points
The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned.
Literature Support
91-84 points
The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned.
Methodology
58-53 points
Content is well-organized with headings for each slide and bulleted lists to group related material as needed. Use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. to enhance readability and presentation content is excellent. Length requirements of 10 slides/pages or less is met.
Average Score
50-85%
40-38 points
More depth/detail for the background and significance is needed, or the research detail is not clear. No search history information is provided.
83-76 points
Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is little integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are included. Summary of information presented is included. Conclusion may not contain a biblical integration.
52-49 points
Content is somewhat organized, but no structure is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. is occasionally detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met.
Poor Quality
0-45%
37-1 points
The background and/or significance are missing. No search history information is provided.
75-1 points
Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is no integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are not included in the summary of information presented. Conclusion does not contain a biblical integration.
48-1 points
There is no clear or logical organizational structure. No logical sequence is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects etc. is often detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met
You Can Also Place the Order at www.collegepaper.us/orders/ordernow or www.crucialessay.com/orders/ordernow