Writing Mechanics and Information Literacy Assignment Discussion

Writing Mechanics and Information Literacy Assignment Discussion

Instructions:

Writing Mechanics and Information Literacy Assignment Discussion

Before beginning work on this week’s discussion post, review the following resources:

Doing Discussion Questions Right

Expanded Grading Rubric

From the assigned readings, select one topic for which you will lead the discussion in the forum this week. Early in the week, reserve your selected topic by posting your response (reservation post) in the Discussion Area, identifying your topic in the subject line. By the due date assigned, research your topic and start a scholarly conversation as you respond with your initial or primary post to your own reservation post.
Some of the main topics (Disturbances Themes) this week include:

Stress

Decision Making

Creativity

Conflict

Other potential topics and subtopics exist in the readings.
Be very specific about the topic you choose (e.g., which conflict theories or what it is about decision making that you are analyzing?). Also, now that you have studied several OB themes in the course, begin looking for relationships between themes from past weeks and the current week and start considering how current organizational environments (globalization, technology, change, etc.) interact with OB.
As the beginning of a scholarly conversation, your initial post should be:

Succinct—no more than 500 words.

Provocative—use concepts and combinations of concepts from the readings to propose relationships, causes, and/or consequences that inspire others to engage (inquire, learn). In other words, take a scholarly stand.

Supported—scholarly conversations are more than opinions. Ideas, statements, and conclusions are supported by clear research and citations from course materials as well as other credible, peer-reviewed resources.

For grading:

The reservation post and initial post are assessed in the rubric line item “Quality of initial posting.”

Neither the reservation post nor the initial post “count” toward days of participation.

Follow-up posts made throughout the week to your colleagues and professor will apply to participation points in the rubric.

All posts will be assessed for writing mechanics and information literacy. Be sure to review the expanded rubric for more details on grading criteria.

27

RUBRIC
Excellent Quality 95-100%	Introduction 45-41 points The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned.		Literature Support 91-84  points The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned.			Methodology 58-53 points Content is well-organized with headings for each slide and bulleted lists to group related material as needed. Use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. to enhance readability and presentation content is excellent. Length requirements of 10 slides/pages or less is met.
Average Score 50-85%	40-38 points More depth/detail for the background and significance is needed, or the research detail is not clear. No search history information is provided.		83-76  points Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is little integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are included. Summary of information presented is included. Conclusion may not contain a biblical integration.			52-49  points Content is somewhat organized, but no structure is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. is occasionally detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met.
Poor Quality 0-45%	37-1 points The background and/or significance are missing. No search history information is provided.		75-1 points Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is no integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are not included in the summary of information presented. Conclusion does not contain a biblical integration.			48-1 points There is no clear or logical organizational structure. No logical sequence is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects etc. is often detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met
You Can Also Place the Order at www.collegepaper.us/orders/ordernow or www.crucialessay.com/orders/ordernow Writing Mechanics and Information Literacy Assignment Discussion

Writing Mechanics and Information Literacy Assignment Discussion

PLACE THE ORDER WITH US TODAY AND GET A PERFECT SCORE!!!