Your Research Article Experience Assignment

Order ID:89JHGSJE83839

Style:APA/MLA/Harvard/Chicago

Pages:5-10

Instructions:

Your Research Article Experience Assignment

You were supposed to read an article related to your area of research interest (i.e., related to psychology), and then use Jordan and Zanna’s recommendations to critically evaluate it. Your post does not address the prompt at all.

In this module’s Understanding Research Paper Assignment, you will read and evaluate a research article in your area of research interest. Using Jordan and Zanna’s (1999) recommendations, you will critically evaluate the article and offer your thoughts on it. As you complete this active evaluation of the research article, do you find yourself struggling with anything? Do you have any questions about the process?

Please report briefly on your experience and post any questions or struggles you have as you read through and critically evaluate your article. Also, please report on the recommendation given by Jordan & Zanna (1999) that you find the most helpful as you evaluate your article.

You were supposed to read an article related to your area of research interest (i.e., related to psychology), and then use Jordan and Zanna’s recommendations to critically evaluate it. Your post does not address the prompt at all.

Your Research Article Experience Assignment

RUBRIC

Excellent Quality

95-100%

Introduction

45-41 points

The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned.

Literature Support

91-84 points

The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned.

Methodology

58-53 points

Content is well-organized with headings for each slide and bulleted lists to group related material as needed. Use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. to enhance readability and presentation content is excellent. Length requirements of 10 slides/pages or less is met.

Average Score

50-85%

40-38 points

More depth/detail for the background and significance is needed, or the research detail is not clear. No search history information is provided.

83-76 points

Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is little integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are included. Summary of information presented is included. Conclusion may not contain a biblical integration.

52-49 points

Content is somewhat organized, but no structure is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. is occasionally detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met.

Poor Quality

0-45%

37-1 points

The background and/or significance are missing. No search history information is provided.

75-1 points

Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is no integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are not included in the summary of information presented. Conclusion does not contain a biblical integration.

48-1 points

There is no clear or logical organizational structure. No logical sequence is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects etc. is often detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met