Order ID:89JHGSJE83839 Style:APA/MLA/Harvard/Chicago Pages:5-10 Instructions:
Fiona Plum is a sales manager with Multi Plan, a firm of computer distributors. During the2013/14 FBT year Fiona received from her employer a base salary of $40,000, an overseas holiday for $3,000, reimbursement of her private telephone expense of $560 and they paid$730 for her CPA professional membership.On 1 April 2013 Fiona also received from her employer a car and a low interest loan of $75,000. The interest rate on the loan was 1.45%. On 1 April 2013 Fiona used $20,000 of it to buy some shares in BHP, $4,000 to extend her overseas holiday and the balance to reduce the mortgage on her home. The car cost $60,000 (including GST) and she drove 50,000 kms over the year, 10,000 kms were for private purposes. Fiona paid $200 to mend one of the car’s tyres while she was travelling and was not reimbursed. Total car expenses (including Fiona’s contribution) were $12,200. Required a Calculate the FBT liability for the 2013/14 FBT year – show all workings and include all legislation (even if items excluded). [10 marks] b Before FBT was introduced, many believed that receiving a car from your employer tax free was tax avoidance. Explain tax avoidance and why FBT was introduced.
RUBRIC
Excellent Quality
95-100%
Introduction 45-41 points
The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned.
Literature Support
91-84 points
The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned.
Methodology
58-53 points
Content is well-organized with headings for each slide and bulleted lists to group related material as needed. Use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. to enhance readability and presentation content is excellent. Length requirements of 10 slides/pages or less is met.
Average Score
50-85%
40-38 points
More depth/detail for the background and significance is needed, or the research detail is not clear. No search history information is provided.
83-76 points
Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is little integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are included. Summary of information presented is included. Conclusion may not contain a biblical integration.
52-49 points
Content is somewhat organized, but no structure is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. is occasionally detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met.
Poor Quality
0-45%
37-1 points
The background and/or significance are missing. No search history information is provided.
75-1 points
Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is no integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are not included in the summary of information presented. Conclusion does not contain a biblical integration.
48-1 points
There is no clear or logical organizational structure. No logical sequence is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects etc. is often detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met
You Can Also Place the Order at www.collegepaper.us/orders/ordernow or www.crucialessay.com/orders/ordernow