Order ID:89JHGSJE83839 Style:APA/MLA/Harvard/Chicago Pages:5-10 Instructions:
Nontraditional macroeconomic policy: financial policy and quantitative easing
Interpret the interest rate as the federal funds rate, the pol-icy interest rate of the Federal Reserve. Assume that there is an unusually high premium added to the federal funds rate when firms borrow to invest.
a). Suppose that the government takes action to improve the solvency of the financial system. If the government’s action is successful, and banks become more willing to lend—both to one another and to nonfinancial firms—what is likely to happen to the premium? What will happen to the IS-LM diagram? Can we consider financial policy a kind of macroeconomic policy?
b). Faced with a zero nominal interest rate, suppose the Fed decides to purchase securities directly to facilitate the flow of credit in the financial markets. This policy is called quantitative easing. If quantitative easing is successful, so that it becomes easier for financial and non-financial firms to obtain credit, what is likely to hap-pen to the premium? What effect will this have on the 1S-LM diagram? If quantitative easing has some effect, is it true that the Fed has no policy options to stimulate the economy when the federal funds rate is zero?
RUBRIC
Excellent Quality
95-100%
Introduction 45-41 points
The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned.
Literature Support
91-84 points
The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned.
Methodology
58-53 points
Content is well-organized with headings for each slide and bulleted lists to group related material as needed. Use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. to enhance readability and presentation content is excellent. Length requirements of 10 slides/pages or less is met.
Average Score
50-85%
40-38 points
More depth/detail for the background and significance is needed, or the research detail is not clear. No search history information is provided.
83-76 points
Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is little integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are included. Summary of information presented is included. Conclusion may not contain a biblical integration.
52-49 points
Content is somewhat organized, but no structure is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. is occasionally detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met.
Poor Quality
0-45%
37-1 points
The background and/or significance are missing. No search history information is provided.
75-1 points
Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is no integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are not included in the summary of information presented. Conclusion does not contain a biblical integration.
48-1 points
There is no clear or logical organizational structure. No logical sequence is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects etc. is often detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met
You Can Also Place the Order at www.collegepaper.us/orders/ordernow or www.crucialessay.com/orders/ordernow