Order ID:89JHGSJE83839 | Style:APA/MLA/Harvard/Chicago | Pages:5-10 |
Instructions:
My internship company is “Beijing Foreign Enterprise Human Resources Service Co., Ltd.”
This is the company website:
https://www.fesco.com.cn/english_aboutus.html
You can refer to Assignment 1 (word file)
9 pages
Internship Report. Write a paper reflecting your experience as an intern and detailing the project you worked on/completed during your internship. The following is a guideline for your report:
1. Title Page
2. Table of Contents – – listing the sections of your report, including appendices with page numbers
3. Executive Summary (1page) – outline your internship experience and how it relates
to your academic learning. This section holds the major findings and implication of the project.
4. Company Profile – This section should be 2 – 3 pages
A description of your place of internship, its mission, vision, values, history, function, activities, and structure. Organizational charts of the department you interned for and/or for the organization may be included as supplements to your report.
5. Your assignment
A) A review of what your assignment was in the organization, what kind of problems or challenges did you encounter? What did you contribute and how were matters handled and resolved.
B) Any recommendations that you might have for improving efficiency, sales, performance, service, research and development, culture within the organization
C) An analysis of what you experienced and relate it to academic theories from strategic management, marketing, organizational behavior, operations management, or other relevant fields. Please share how anything you were exposed to in your assignment was related to your curriculum at UCB.
D) Please describe the relationship you had to leaders in the organization and what you learned about leadership from your internship. Are there any leadership characteristics that you observed that you would like to incorporate into your own leadership style?
E) Personal thoughts about your career choices and path after your Master’s Degree Program.
Your recommendations and analysis must be supported by references, data charts, and logical deductions and cited sources. Your report should be at least 7 to 10 pages long (minimum) with relevant charts and graphs. Have at least five sources cited and included in your reference or bibliography section. Title page and table of contents are not counted in the 7 to 10 pages.
RUBRIC |
||||||
Excellent Quality 95-100%
|
Introduction
45-41 points The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned. |
Literature Support 91-84 points The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned. |
Methodology 58-53 points Content is well-organized with headings for each slide and bulleted lists to group related material as needed. Use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. to enhance readability and presentation content is excellent. Length requirements of 10 slides/pages or less is met. |
|||
Average Score 50-85% |
40-38 points More depth/detail for the background and significance is needed, or the research detail is not clear. No search history information is provided. |
83-76 points Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is little integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are included. Summary of information presented is included. Conclusion may not contain a biblical integration. |
52-49 points Content is somewhat organized, but no structure is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. is occasionally detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met. |
|||
Poor Quality 0-45% |
37-1 points The background and/or significance are missing. No search history information is provided. |
75-1 points Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is no integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are not included in the summary of information presented. Conclusion does not contain a biblical integration. |
48-1 points There is no clear or logical organizational structure. No logical sequence is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects etc. is often detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met |
|||
You Can Also Place the Order at www.collegepaper.us/orders/ordernow or www.crucialessay.com/orders/ordernow
|