Order ID:89JHGSJE83839 | Style:APA/MLA/Harvard/Chicago | Pages:5-10 |
Instructions:
1. Your post should be about at least two paragraphs.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CtsUtqdFNCo
Discuss what you learned about Practice Management Integration and the symposium on the promises and challenges of realizing the value of EHR (Electronic Health Record). What role can health informatics play in realizing these values?
2. As with all reaction essays, please read and follow the generic instructions on the here.
For this essay, please react to Viewpoint article on “Back to the Future: Achieving Health Equity Through Health Informatics and Digital Health ” https://mhealth.jmir.org/2020/1/e14512/pdf (Links to an external site.)
· Do you agree with their assessment of the unintended consequences of advancement in health technologies?
· Discuss in particular an example in the article that illustrates these consequences?
· Which of the approaches discussed in the article to foster equity and reduced divide in digital health would be suitable for an application development project for a population diverse in race and socioeconomic status?
3. Comment on the “Optimal Allocation of Student” article
RUBRIC |
||||||
Excellent Quality 95-100%
|
Introduction
45-41 points The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned. |
Literature Support 91-84 points The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned. |
Methodology 58-53 points Content is well-organized with headings for each slide and bulleted lists to group related material as needed. Use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. to enhance readability and presentation content is excellent. Length requirements of 10 slides/pages or less is met. |
|||
Average Score 50-85% |
40-38 points More depth/detail for the background and significance is needed, or the research detail is not clear. No search history information is provided. |
83-76 points Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is little integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are included. Summary of information presented is included. Conclusion may not contain a biblical integration. |
52-49 points Content is somewhat organized, but no structure is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. is occasionally detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met. |
|||
Poor Quality 0-45% |
37-1 points The background and/or significance are missing. No search history information is provided. |
75-1 points Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is no integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are not included in the summary of information presented. Conclusion does not contain a biblical integration. |
48-1 points There is no clear or logical organizational structure. No logical sequence is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects etc. is often detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met |
|||
You Can Also Place the Order at www.collegepaper.us/orders/ordernow or www.crucialessay.com/orders/ordernow
|