Order ID:89JHGSJE83839 | Style:APA/MLA/Harvard/Chicago | Pages:5-10 |
Instructions:
Complete the uploaded documents SCI 200 Project Part Two Speaking Notes Draft Guidelines and complete SCI 200 Project Part Two Guideline and Rubric and answer the questions below the issue.
This is the issue you are working with
My issue:
I want to learn all I can about natural life. The field of natural science that interests me most is getting outside and exploring new places where one can see all the natural phenomena that our beautiful land offers. In this session of travel, either through work or vacation, it is good to make a point of exposure and see new features based on the distinct location in which the environment offers. Hiking up mountains, through the forest, and even spending time is what most people consider perfect, especially on vacation.
QUESTIONS
1. Describe your topic’s scientific background. In other words, how is your issue related to the natural sciences?
2. How is your audience impacted by your issue? Why should they care about what you are researching?
3. What empirical evidence did you find to support your stance on your issue and question?
4. Why does this issue matter to you personally? Why did you choose this topic for your research?
5. How has doing your research project impacted the way you think about your issue? Has thinking like a scientist had an effect on your thinking?
RUBRIC |
||||||
Excellent Quality 95-100%
|
Introduction
45-41 points The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned. |
Literature Support 91-84 points The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned. |
Methodology 58-53 points Content is well-organized with headings for each slide and bulleted lists to group related material as needed. Use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. to enhance readability and presentation content is excellent. Length requirements of 10 slides/pages or less is met. |
|||
Average Score 50-85% |
40-38 points More depth/detail for the background and significance is needed, or the research detail is not clear. No search history information is provided. |
83-76 points Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is little integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are included. Summary of information presented is included. Conclusion may not contain a biblical integration. |
52-49 points Content is somewhat organized, but no structure is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. is occasionally detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met. |
|||
Poor Quality 0-45% |
37-1 points The background and/or significance are missing. No search history information is provided. |
75-1 points Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is no integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are not included in the summary of information presented. Conclusion does not contain a biblical integration. |
48-1 points There is no clear or logical organizational structure. No logical sequence is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects etc. is often detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met |
|||
You Can Also Place the Order at www.collegepaper.us/orders/ordernow or www.crucialessay.com/orders/ordernow
|