Environmental Science Article Summary Assignment Paper
Order ID:89JHGSJE83839 Style:APA/MLA/Harvard/Chicago Pages:5-10 Instructions:
Environmental Science Article Summary Assignment Paper
Like the mini review you conducted week 1, reaction papers are design to facilitate your engagement with the primary literature. However, reaction papers ask you to think critically about the material you are reading, rather than simply summarize it. You will complete three reaction papers during the course. I strongly encourage you to use papers related to your final paper topic.
Your task:
Locate a peer-reviewed journal article focusing on an environmental social science topic. Ensure your paper is a study where primary data collection occurred, not a review or an opinion piece. Consult the list of journals in the mini review assignment for ideas on where to look for articles, or to compare if you are unsure about the source of a certain manuscript.
Read the article using the methods we discussed in class (YouTube video). Make sure you thoroughly understand the purpose, the methods, results, and meaning of the results. Its ok if the statistics are more advanced than your current level. However, I encourage you to select papers that are within your scope of understanding.
For your paper provide a 2-3 page (double spaced, 12pt Calibri or Times font, 1 in margin) summary and analysis of the work.
A summary of the article including:
Article title and where and when it was published
Study purpose
Research questions or hypotheses
Method of data collection and the human population of interest
Main findings from the results
Implications of the findings for theory or practice
Analysis of the work by answering the following questions
What philosophical orientation are the authors following? This wont be explicitly stated in the study. Based on what you learned, what is your assessment and why? – See the table in the Moon and Blackman (2014) paper for help.
How do the results of this study challenge what you already know about this topic; or do you disagree with the veracity of the findings, and why?
Does this study spawn any new questions you could research, if so what are they; or, what could the authors have done differently to make the study better and why?
RUBRIC
Excellent Quality
95-100%
Introduction 45-41 points
The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned.
Literature Support
91-84 points
The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned.
Methodology
58-53 points
Content is well-organized with headings for each slide and bulleted lists to group related material as needed. Use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. to enhance readability and presentation content is excellent. Length requirements of 10 slides/pages or less is met.
Average Score
50-85%
40-38 points
More depth/detail for the background and significance is needed, or the research detail is not clear. No search history information is provided.
83-76 points
Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is little integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are included. Summary of information presented is included. Conclusion may not contain a biblical integration.
52-49 points
Content is somewhat organized, but no structure is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. is occasionally detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met.
Poor Quality
0-45%
37-1 points
The background and/or significance are missing. No search history information is provided.
75-1 points
Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is no integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are not included in the summary of information presented. Conclusion does not contain a biblical integration.
48-1 points
There is no clear or logical organizational structure. No logical sequence is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects etc. is often detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met
You Can Also Place the Order at www.collegepaper.us/orders/ordernow or www.crucialessay.com/orders/ordernow Environmental Science Article Summary Assignment Paper
Environmental Science Article Summary Assignment Paper