Post-Traumatic Stress Disorder (PTSD) Case Study Assignment
Order ID:89JHGSJE83839 Style:APA/MLA/Harvard/Chicago Pages:5-10 Instructions:
Post-Traumatic Stress Disorder (PTSD) Case Study Assignment
Memo (correctly formatted as a memo (Links to an external site.): about 1 full page, broken into short topical paragraphs, single-spaced).
This component is intended to be completed at the end of the assignment. Please reply to these two prompts, in addition to any other context you’d like to provide about the assignment:
Describe your general approach to the assignment and how/why you edited the document following peer review (include both your peer reviewers’ names (first & last) and describe exactly what they suggested and how you addressed those issues in your subsequent drafts. Whether or not you chose to include suggestions offered by your peer reviewers, explain why).
Explain what you learned about your own writing/approach to the assignment by reviewing your peers’ work.
- Three Audience Analyses (100-150 words each; 300-450 words total – these are strict word limits): Identify three different rhetorical contexts that you are or have recently been a part of.
These can be jobs, internships, clubs and/or committees, etc. Ideally these will come directly from your resume and cover letter activity.
These CANNOT be classes you’ve taken/are taking for which your only role is/was as a student. We are, after all, in a “Professional” writing course, in which one of our goals is to begin thinking beyond the confines of the classroom.
Nevertheless, if you happened to be a lab or teaching assistant for a certain course, you may use that context. For example, if you took ENES100 last semester, you cannot use that. However, if you took ENES100 a couple of semesters ago, and last semester you served as a teaching fellow, then you can use that. For each description, identify:
- a)the name of the company/organization/committee/etc. and what they do/are responsible for/etc.; b)your title within the company/organization/committee/etc. and your role/responsibilities; and) a summary of the other people/titles/organizational hierarchy, along with their roles and responsibilities.
III. Three Extended Definitions, each according to the format linked here (Links to an external site.) (200-300 words each; 600-900 words total – these are strict word limits) – For each of your three chosen audiences/rhetorical contexts, you will create an extended definition in which you define one of the terms provided in the following sections, tailoring each definition for the specific needs/competencies/etc. of each of your three audiences/rhetorical contexts.
Term Selection
As discussed, you are to choose just one (1) of the following terms that you will then define/tailor for each of your three audiences/rhetorical contexts.
If you are unfamiliar with the terms, be sure to research online in order to fully understand. You MAY NOT choose your own term; it must come from the list below. In the end, you are encouraged to be creative in order to tailor your definition to your different audiences.
Terms (Choose one)
Cloud Computing
Evidence-based Practice
Blended Learning
Critical Thinking
Malware
A/B testing
Native advertising
Post-traumatic Stress Disorder (PTSD)
Cochlear Impact
Community Policing
Requirements: 4 pages
Attached is an example of the assignment
Sender notified by
Mailtrack 05/12/21, 06:56:32 AM
RUBRIC
Excellent Quality
95-100%
Introduction 45-41 points
The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned.
Literature Support
91-84 points
The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned.
Methodology
58-53 points
Content is well-organized with headings for each slide and bulleted lists to group related material as needed. Use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. to enhance readability and presentation content is excellent. Length requirements of 10 slides/pages or less is met.
Average Score
50-85%
40-38 points
More depth/detail for the background and significance is needed, or the research detail is not clear. No search history information is provided.
83-76 points
Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is little integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are included. Summary of information presented is included. Conclusion may not contain a biblical integration.
52-49 points
Content is somewhat organized, but no structure is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. is occasionally detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met.
Poor Quality
0-45%
37-1 points
The background and/or significance are missing. No search history information is provided.
75-1 points
Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is no integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are not included in the summary of information presented. Conclusion does not contain a biblical integration.
48-1 points
There is no clear or logical organizational structure. No logical sequence is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects etc. is often detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met
You Can Also Place the Order at www.collegepaper.us/orders/ordernow or www.crucialessay.com/orders/ordernow