Order ID:89JHGSJE83839 | Style:APA/MLA/Harvard/Chicago | Pages:5-10 |
Instructions:
In the lesson on Lord Byron, you learned about the Byronic hero. The Byronic hero has many traits which make him different from the traditional hero, and he often has many traits of the anti-hero. However, Byronic heroes are different from anti-heroes in that they are psychologically ″damaged,″ and they carry a strong sense of internal conflict as a result of guilt or shame related to their past. This internal sense that they are wrong/evil will drive the character to try and correct wrongs in the world or do right in order to bury the guilt. If these characters are not trying to correct the wrongs by doing the right (heroic) actions, then they isolate themselves from the world and see their absence as a favor to the world. These characters try and avoid connections with others in an attempt to protect others from the evil they see in themselves. If the character lacks the trait of deep internal conflict (guilt and shame over their past) that drives their behavior, then they would be an anti-hero instead of a Byronic hero. Anti-heroes can have all the traits of a Byronic hero, but they will lack the internal conflict that makes the Byronic hero do heroic deeds. Byronic heroes may be: Cynical Strongly emotional Intense Defiant/rebellious (regarding societal rules/values) Independent/isolated Proud Stubborn Guilty/Remorseful Moody Masochistic (self-punishment) Contrite/compunctious It is important to differentiate between the anti-hero and the Byronic character. An anti-hero can have any of the traits listed above, but if they lack the psychological and emotional component, then they are only an anti-hero and not Byronic. Your explanations must focus on how the character you choose fits the psychological and emotional components of a Byronic hero. If you only explain the traits that an anti-hero shares with a Byronic hero, then you will not have explained how the character is Byronic. For this assignment, you will choose two modern-day Byronic heroes from literature, television, or a movie. These characters should be fictional as it is not possible to tell the inner motivations of a real, living person. In 150 words or more for each character, you will explain how each fictional character fits the role of a Byronic hero. You may use a word processor or PowerPoint (or similar) to complete this project. Include pictures of the characters along with their identified traits and explanations. Please see the example below. Projects completed using a word processor should follow a similar structure. Heading and headers. Two modern Byronic characters with traits and explanations. Include pictures. Each explanation is at least 150 words. A works cited page entry for each book, movie, or television show. Uploaded file should be titled with your first name, last name, and the title of the assignment (not the essay). The Title of assignment is Byronic Heroes
RUBRIC |
||||||
Excellent Quality 95-100%
|
Introduction
45-41 points The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned. |
Literature Support 91-84 points The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned. |
Methodology 58-53 points Content is well-organized with headings for each slide and bulleted lists to group related material as needed. Use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. to enhance readability and presentation content is excellent. Length requirements of 10 slides/pages or less is met. |
|||
Average Score 50-85% |
40-38 points More depth/detail for the background and significance is needed, or the research detail is not clear. No search history information is provided. |
83-76 points Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is little integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are included. Summary of information presented is included. Conclusion may not contain a biblical integration. |
52-49 points Content is somewhat organized, but no structure is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. is occasionally detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met. |
|||
Poor Quality 0-45% |
37-1 points The background and/or significance are missing. No search history information is provided. |
75-1 points Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is no integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are not included in the summary of information presented. Conclusion does not contain a biblical integration. |
48-1 points There is no clear or logical organizational structure. No logical sequence is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects etc. is often detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met |
|||
You Can Also Place the Order at www.collegepaper.us/orders/ordernow or www.crucialessay.com/orders/ordernow
|