Order ID:89JHGSJE83839 | Style:APA/MLA/Harvard/Chicago | Pages:5-10 |
Instructions:
For this , you will need to select 1 of the 3 statements below and support or dispute the statement. You will need to include citations for this , and your draft must be a minimum of 100 words. You will have 2 attempts. I recommend that you type your essay response into another document to check for grammar. This will also serve as a backup, just in case you encounter technical difficulties.
Essay Prompt
1. Select 1 of the 3 statements below.
On September 23, 2021, President Biden announced his nomination of Dr. Saule Omarova to become the next Comptroller of the Currency and oversee the U.S. national banking system. After heated questioning from some members of the Senate Banking, Housing, and Urban Affairs Committee, Dr. Omarova later withdrew her nomination. Despite the controversial comments made, this is an example of checks and balances.
Former President Trump has every right to block all communication from his Administration regarding the January 6, 2021 insurrection from the January 6th Commission. The former President is immune from investigation, and the January 6th Commission and Democrats only seek to violate the separation of powers by conducting an investigation.
The OSHA (Occupational Safety and Health Administration) vaccine and test mandate for health care workers and private companies with more than 100 employees is an example of the overreach of federalism. Covid-19 does not require a national response, and the Biden Administration’s mandate limits states’ rights.
2. Support or dispute your selected statement in a minimum of 100 words. Utilize 1-2 data/statistics or quotes to support your point of view.
3. Do not forget to include at least 2 citations. (Citations do not count toward the word requirement.)
RUBRIC |
||||||
Excellent Quality 95-100%
|
Introduction
45-41 points The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned. |
Literature Support 91-84 points The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned. |
Methodology 58-53 points Content is well-organized with headings for each slide and bulleted lists to group related material as needed. Use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. to enhance readability and presentation content is excellent. Length requirements of 10 slides/pages or less is met. |
|||
Average Score 50-85% |
40-38 points More depth/detail for the background and significance is needed, or the research detail is not clear. No search history information is provided. |
83-76 points Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is little integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are included. Summary of information presented is included. Conclusion may not contain a biblical integration. |
52-49 points Content is somewhat organized, but no structure is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. is occasionally detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met. |
|||
Poor Quality 0-45% |
37-1 points The background and/or significance are missing. No search history information is provided. |
75-1 points Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is no integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are not included in the summary of information presented. Conclusion does not contain a biblical integration. |
48-1 points There is no clear or logical organizational structure. No logical sequence is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects etc. is often detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met |
|||
You Can Also Place the Order at www.collegepaper.us/orders/ordernow or www.crucialessay.com/orders/ordernow
|