Order ID:89JHGSJE83839 | Style:APA/MLA/Harvard/Chicago | Pages:5-10 |
Instructions:
PHT 2287 Cardiopulmonary Conditions Project
This project will consist of:
Instructions: Write a paper related to your assigned cardiopulmonary condition then summarize the paper in a presentation of no more than 15 minutes.
Content: The paper must at minimum address all of the topics/questions on the next page. Any information that is specific to your condition should also be included. The paper should be at least 6 pages in length (this does not included introduction page and reference page).
Sources: The paper should be based on the Essentials of Cardiopulmonary Physical therapy textbook and any other textbooks utilized or accessible in the program or library. The paper MUST contain a MINIMUM of 4 research articles from a scholarly journal no older than 2017.
Format/Style: The paper and references (both books and journals) must be in APA style 7th Edition (See Writing Lab for assistance)
Intellectual property: All content in the paper must be your own thoughts. All information taken from textbooks, scholarly journals or other sources must be cited within the paper and cited in the references. Any plagiarism will result in an automatic “0” on the project. The similarity index for submission must be 25% or less.
Cardiopulmonary Conditions Instructions
(Must be included in paper and discussed in presentation)
Research Article Critique Grading Rubric A research article critique is not merely a review or summary of a study but rather a careful, critical appraisal of the strengths and limitations of research report. A written critique should serve as a guide to researchers and practitioners while they appraise the evidence to improve nursing practice. The ideal critique should suggest possibilities for improving the design of replication efforts and should thus help to advance a particular area of knowledge. The critique should also help those who are practicing nursing decide if or how the findings from the study can best be incorporated into their practice, if at all.
Article:
Aktaş, Y. Y., & Karabulut, N. (2015). The effects of music therapy in endotracheal suctioning of mechanically ventilated patients. Nursing in Critical Care, 21(1), 44-52
KEY ITEMS TO BE INCLUDED IN CRITIQUE
Research Problem and Purpose 1. Does the introduction demonstrate the need for the study? 2. Is the problem clearly identified? 3. Is the purpose of the study clearly stated? 4. Does the study have the potential to help solve a current clinical problem? Literature Review 1. Is the review of literature relevant to the problem? 2. Is the literature review adequate in terms of range, scope of ideas, and points of view relevant to the problem identified? 3.
Is the review of literature well organized and synthesized? Methods 1. What research design was used? 2. Is the design appropriate for the study’s purpose? 3. Was the protection of human subject considered? 4. What key variables are examined? 5. Are the details of data collection clearly and logically presented? 6. Are the instruments described sufficiently in terms of content, structure, validity, and reliability? 7. Is the population and the method of selecting the sample adequately described? 8. Is the selection of the sample appropriate? 9. Is the sample size sufficient? 10. What are the limits to generalizability in terms of external validity? Results 1. Is the presentation of data clear? 2. Are the characteristics of the sample described in result section?
RUBRIC |
||||||
Excellent Quality 95-100%
|
Introduction
45-41 points The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned. |
Literature Support 91-84 points The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned. |
Methodology 58-53 points Content is well-organized with headings for each slide and bulleted lists to group related material as needed. Use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. to enhance readability and presentation content is excellent. Length requirements of 10 slides/pages or less is met. |
|||
Average Score 50-85% |
40-38 points More depth/detail for the background and significance is needed, or the research detail is not clear. No search history information is provided. |
83-76 points Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is little integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are included. Summary of information presented is included. Conclusion may not contain a biblical integration. |
52-49 points Content is somewhat organized, but no structure is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. is occasionally detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met. |
|||
Poor Quality 0-45% |
37-1 points The background and/or significance are missing. No search history information is provided. |
75-1 points Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is no integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are not included in the summary of information presented. Conclusion does not contain a biblical integration. |
48-1 points There is no clear or logical organizational structure. No logical sequence is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects etc. is often detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met |
|||
You Can Also Place the Order at www.collegepaper.us/orders/ordernow or www.crucialessay.com/orders/ordernow
PHT 2287 Cardiopulmonary Conditions Project |
PHT 2287 Cardiopulmonary Conditions Project