Order ID:89JHGSJE83839 | Style:APA/MLA/Harvard/Chicago | Pages:5-10 |
Instructions:
Controlling Listeria Monocytogenes Discussion Assignment
This quarter, we have considered how different classes of pollutants are regulated within the same law. For example, under the Clean Air Act, more stringent approaches are used for criteria pollutants (health-based standards) compared to hazardous air pollutants (technology-based standards). The Clean Water Act regulates point sources using the NPDES program, while Best Management Practices (which are unenforceable) limit pollution from non-point sources. The FDA regulates food safety under the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act (FFDCA); in 1996, regulation of pesticides was switched from the FDA to the EPA. The EPA has set tolerance levels for pesticides, rather than a complete ban on pesticides. The case study presented by Joy Waite-Cusik on romaine lettuce, suggests that we should consider using permissible exposure levels (or tolerance levels) rather than a complete ban on certain pathogens in food.
Focusing on specific pathogen (Listeria monocytogenes), should FDA (or EPA) regulate the pathogen using (less stringent) permissible exposure levels or a complete ban? What are the pros and cons of each approach? Justify your answer.
RUBRIC |
||||||
Excellent Quality 95-100%
|
Introduction
45-41 points The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned. |
Literature Support 91-84 points The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned. |
Methodology 58-53 points Content is well-organized with headings for each slide and bulleted lists to group related material as needed. Use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. to enhance readability and presentation content is excellent. Length requirements of 10 slides/pages or less is met. |
|||
Average Score 50-85% |
40-38 points More depth/detail for the background and significance is needed, or the research detail is not clear. No search history information is provided. |
83-76 points Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is little integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are included. Summary of information presented is included. Conclusion may not contain a biblical integration. |
52-49 points Content is somewhat organized, but no structure is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. is occasionally detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met. |
|||
Poor Quality 0-45% |
37-1 points The background and/or significance are missing. No search history information is provided. |
75-1 points Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is no integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are not included in the summary of information presented. Conclusion does not contain a biblical integration. |
48-1 points There is no clear or logical organizational structure. No logical sequence is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects etc. is often detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met |
|||
You Can Also Place the Order at www.collegepaper.us/orders/ordernow or www.crucialessay.com/orders/ordernow
Controlling Listeria Monocytogenes Discussion Assignment |
Controlling Listeria Monocytogenes Discussion Assignment