Order ID:89JHGSJE83839 | Style:APA/MLA/Harvard/Chicago | Pages:5-10 |
Instructions:
Problem-Solving And Change Action Research Response
RESPONSE GUIDELINES
Read the posts of your peers and respond to at least two. For each response, explore the discussion posted by your peer and offer insights that might assist him or her and the organization.
Student post down below:
It holds many avenues to travel concerning my business. My goal is to retire in 2022 and focus more on my real estate business and help those in need of a home. I found communications in multimedia online can give outstanding results, but I need time to manage, respond to the post in your old-line feed. The media contacts such as Facebook, tweet, Instagram, and message are connected to person one that could have over a thousand connections. Online, and rely on email and social media to quickly establish and nurture these relationships, hoping their story will go viral.
Action research has repeatedly facilitated problem-solving and change in many settings through collaboration driven by the community at the heart of the study. However, the ethical review of action research can be challenging for action researchers and research ethics committees. This paper explores how action researchers and research ethics committees can use seven ethical principles as the basis for an honest review.
This paper concludes by offering some suggestions for a way forward for both action researchers and research ethics committees. The wide world web is the faster way to reach the public for sales, surveys, emergency broadcasting, and receiving ongoing press coverage. However, it also can run a company or individual reputation. In today’s marketing, social media is real-time, which can be a Public Relations nightmare as a goal mind for online evolution.
It can be viewed as fast speed in communication and company propaganda or publicly available information presented as breaking news or proprietary data. Stringer (2017) online promotes the use of action research for personal, group, and community development possible for communications professionals—or anyone with an Internet connection—to instantly push news out to the entire world.
The following websites are a small sample of those that provide resources for people involved in action research activities and projects. Websites continue to evolve, and some either disappear or are not updated, though better sources offer ongoing access to helpful information (Stringer, 2017, pg 239). To find websites with a particular focus, action researchers may use any popular search engines, entering key descriptors to identify potentially relevant sources.
Problem-Solving And Change Action Research Response
RUBRIC |
||||||
Excellent Quality 95-100%
|
Introduction
45-41 points The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned. |
Literature Support 91-84 points The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned. |
Methodology 58-53 points Content is well-organized with headings for each slide and bulleted lists to group related material as needed. Use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. to enhance readability and presentation content is excellent. Length requirements of 10 slides/pages or less is met. |
|||
Average Score 50-85% |
40-38 points More depth/detail for the background and significance is needed, or the research detail is not clear. No search history information is provided. |
83-76 points Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is little integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are included. Summary of information presented is included. Conclusion may not contain a biblical integration. |
52-49 points Content is somewhat organized, but no structure is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. is occasionally detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met. |
|||
Poor Quality 0-45% |
37-1 points The background and/or significance are missing. No search history information is provided. |
75-1 points Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is no integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are not included in the summary of information presented. Conclusion does not contain a biblical integration. |
48-1 points There is no clear or logical organizational structure. No logical sequence is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects etc. is often detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met |
|||
You Can Also Place the Order at www.collegepaper.us/orders/ordernow or www.crucialessay.com/orders/ordernow
Problem-Solving And Change Action Research Response |
Problem-Solving And Change Action Research Response