Final Assignment Integrated Research Review Instructions
Order ID:89JHGSJE83839 Style:APA/MLA/Harvard/Chicago Pages:5-10 Instructions:
Final Assignment Integrated Research Review Instructions
This is the final submission of your Research Review paper focusing on your chosen PICO (T). In this assignment you will combine all the elements from the first and second assignment to have a completed Integrated Research Review paper. It is the expectation that you now have made all corrections, edits and revisions based on instructor feedback and all content is included from prior instructions and rubrics.
If corrections are not made there will be up to a 20%-point deduction.
Final Assignment – 100 points possible.
Refer to Final Assignment Rubric
Instructions: Follow APA 7th ed. Format and 1. Use APA 7th ed. Manual or recommend APA template sites listed in content section to set up paper and. (Chapter 2, APA manual 7th ed.)
- Write in 12 font Times New Roman
- DO NOT write in first person.
- Combine Part 1 and Part 2 following the Final Assignment Rubric. Use Final Assignment Rubric headings in the paper. Ensure all corrections and edits from the first two assignments have been made. Include all previous tables, diagrams, figures, and Appendixes with corrections made.
- Write in paragraph format
- Follow APA format for headings (see APA 7th ed. Section 2.7).
- All corrections/edits from instructor feedback are made to the assignment and turn it in report is less than 20%.
- Reference Section is complete, accurately reflects all research articles minimum 7 articles on a separate page following APA 7th ed format, Chapter 9-10.
Final Assignment Integrated Research Review Instructions
RUBRIC
Excellent Quality
95-100%
Introduction 45-41 points
The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned.
Literature Support
91-84 points
The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned.
Methodology
58-53 points
Content is well-organized with headings for each slide and bulleted lists to group related material as needed. Use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. to enhance readability and presentation content is excellent. Length requirements of 10 slides/pages or less is met.
Average Score
50-85%
40-38 points
More depth/detail for the background and significance is needed, or the research detail is not clear. No search history information is provided.
83-76 points
Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is little integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are included. Summary of information presented is included. Conclusion may not contain a biblical integration.
52-49 points
Content is somewhat organized, but no structure is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. is occasionally detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met.
Poor Quality
0-45%
37-1 points
The background and/or significance are missing. No search history information is provided.
75-1 points
Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is no integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are not included in the summary of information presented. Conclusion does not contain a biblical integration.
48-1 points
There is no clear or logical organizational structure. No logical sequence is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects etc. is often detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met
You Can Also Place the Order at www.collegepaper.us/orders/ordernow or www.crucialessay.com/orders/ordernow