Order ID:89JHGSJE83839 | Style:APA/MLA/Harvard/Chicago | Pages:5-10 |
Instructions:
1-Read The Great Transformation, “Introduction,” Karen Armstrong is a writer who lives in the United
2-“The Greek Worldview,” Richard Tarna’s The Passion of the Western Mind
3-“Socrates,” Richard Tarnas’ The Passion of the Western Mind
4-Plato’s “The Allegory of the Cave”:
(FOR MORE INFORMATION, SEE THE ATTACHED FILES)
Then:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ePk1Ol7ZLwI “The Axial Revolution” (This is a link to another website.)
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vyt-62JsZjw “What is the Socratic Method” (This is a link to another website.)
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3n zitj FI8 “Socrates’ Philosophy” (This is a link to another website.)
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=q4oKtP71H3g “Plato’s Philosophy” (This is a link to another website.)
Pick one point of interest from the READINGS and at least one point of connection from the VIDEOS to be the basis of a 200-word reflection post after completing the readings and videos assigned in the discussion board. The first post should be well-written and demonstrate a level of understanding of the point(s) under consideration.
RUBRIC |
||||||
Excellent Quality 95-100%
|
Introduction
45-41 points The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned. |
Literature Support 91-84 points The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned. |
Methodology 58-53 points Content is well-organized with headings for each slide and bulleted lists to group related material as needed. Use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. to enhance readability and presentation content is excellent. Length requirements of 10 slides/pages or less is met. |
|||
Average Score 50-85% |
40-38 points More depth/detail for the background and significance is needed, or the research detail is not clear. No search history information is provided. |
83-76 points Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is little integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are included. Summary of information presented is included. Conclusion may not contain a biblical integration. |
52-49 points Content is somewhat organized, but no structure is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. is occasionally detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met. |
|||
Poor Quality 0-45% |
37-1 points The background and/or significance are missing. No search history information is provided. |
75-1 points Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is no integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are not included in the summary of information presented. Conclusion does not contain a biblical integration. |
48-1 points There is no clear or logical organizational structure. No logical sequence is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects etc. is often detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met |
|||
You Can Also Place the Order at www.collegepaper.us/orders/ordernow or www.crucialessay.com/orders/ordernow
Discussion on the Axial Revolution |
Discussion on the Axial Revolution