Order ID:89JHGSJE83839 | Style:APA/MLA/Harvard/Chicago | Pages:5-10 |
Instructions:
Jingjing Huangs and Chinese Urban Film Centers Evaluation and Discussion
I need you to write a one-page single-spaced evaluation essay on one of my classmates’ presentations. As this is an evaluation essay, no sources are used in the essay I’d like it to be. If you could talk about what you learned and got out of the
presentation, you could relate what you learned to the books we’re reading in class (misbehaving and nudge, both by Richard Thaler), but you don’t have to if you can’t find them online for free. Another question I’d like you to answer in the essay
is whether there was any new information you learned from the classmate. Jingjing Huang is the classmate about whom you must write. If I hadn’t attached the transcript, it would have had the same issue as when I attached the csreeen
recording.
Jingjing Huangs and Chinese Urban Film Centers Evaluation and Discussion
RUBRIC |
||||||
Excellent Quality 95-100%
|
Introduction
45-41 points The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned. |
Literature Support 91-84 points The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned. |
Methodology 58-53 points Content is well-organized with headings for each slide and bulleted lists to group related material as needed. Use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. to enhance readability and presentation content is excellent. Length requirements of 10 slides/pages or less is met. |
|||
Average Score 50-85% |
40-38 points More depth/detail for the background and significance is needed, or the research detail is not clear. No search history information is provided. |
83-76 points Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is little integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are included. Summary of information presented is included. Conclusion may not contain a biblical integration. |
52-49 points Content is somewhat organized, but no structure is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. is occasionally detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met. |
|||
Poor Quality 0-45% |
37-1 points The background and/or significance are missing. No search history information is provided. |
75-1 points Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is no integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are not included in the summary of information presented. Conclusion does not contain a biblical integration. |
48-1 points There is no clear or logical organizational structure. No logical sequence is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects etc. is often detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met |
|||
You Can Also Place the Order at www.collegepaper.us/orders/ordernow or www.crucialessay.com/orders/ordernow
Jingjing Huangs and Chinese Urban Film Centers Evaluation and Discussion |
Jingjing Huangs and Chinese Urban Film Centers Evaluation and Discussion