Order ID:89JHGSJE83839 | Style:APA/MLA/Harvard/Chicago | Pages:5-10 |
Instructions:
Discussion 3.1
Why is it so difficult to protect children on the Internet? What are some of the challenges faced by law enforcement? You can also list some of the challenges faced by parents.
Discussion 3.2
Why is health care information protected? Find a case where health confidentiality was violated and share it with the class.
Case Study 3.1
Choose either Children’s Online Privacy Protection Act (COPPA), the Children’s Internet Protection Act (CIPA), the Family Educational Rights and Privacy Act (FERPA), or the Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act. In a 3 to 4 page paper (Not including title and reference pages) describe the Act you chose. Provide details behind why the Act was created and any legal cases that either led to the Act being created or that used the Act for prosecution or defense in a case. Use 2 to 3 separate sources and make sure you cite those sources according to APA format.
Writing Requirements
34 pages in length (excluding cover page, abstract, and reference list)
Include at least 2-3 peer reviewed sources that are properly cited
APA format, Use the APA template located in the Student Resource Center to complete the assignment.
Please use the Case Study Guide as a reference point for writing your case study.
RUBRIC |
||||||
Excellent Quality 95-100%
|
Introduction
45-41 points The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned. |
Literature Support 91-84 points The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned. |
Methodology 58-53 points Content is well-organized with headings for each slide and bulleted lists to group related material as needed. Use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. to enhance readability and presentation content is excellent. Length requirements of 10 slides/pages or less is met. |
|||
Average Score 50-85% |
40-38 points More depth/detail for the background and significance is needed, or the research detail is not clear. No search history information is provided. |
83-76 points Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is little integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are included. Summary of information presented is included. Conclusion may not contain a biblical integration. |
52-49 points Content is somewhat organized, but no structure is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. is occasionally detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met. |
|||
Poor Quality 0-45% |
37-1 points The background and/or significance are missing. No search history information is provided. |
75-1 points Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is no integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are not included in the summary of information presented. Conclusion does not contain a biblical integration. |
48-1 points There is no clear or logical organizational structure. No logical sequence is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects etc. is often detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met |
|||
You Can Also Place the Order at www.collegepaper.us/orders/ordernow or www.crucialessay.com/orders/ordernow |
Children’s Online Privacy Protection Act