Order ID:89JHGSJE83839 Style:APA/MLA/Harvard/Chicago Pages:5-10 Instructions:
Aspect of Human Resource Management Essay
what is happening, may give up, feeling that the team will never work together effectively. The project manager and team members must be tolerant of one another as they explore their differences. The project manager may need to continue to be highly directive.
If the team survives the storming stage, it may enter the norming stage. During this stage, individual team members give up their preconceived judgments and opinions. Mem- bers who felt a need to take control of the team give up this impulse. Team members adjust their behavior toward one another and begin to trust one another. The team may decide to document a set of team rules or norms to guide how they will work together.
Teamwork actually begins. The project manager can be less directive and can expect team members to take more responsibility for decision making.
Some teams advance beyond the norming stage into the performing stage. At this point, the team is performing at a high level. Team members are competent, highly moti- vated, and knowledgeable about all aspects of the project. They have become interdepen- dent on one another and have developed an effective decision-making process that does not require the project manager. Dissent is expected, and the team has developed an effective process to ensure that everyone’s ideas and opinions are heard. Work is done quickly and with high quality. Problems that once seemed unsolvable now have “obvious” solutions. The team’s effectiveness is much more than the sum of the individual members’ contributions. The project manager encourages participative decision making, with the team members making most of the decisions.
No matter what stage a team is operating in, it commonly will revert to less advanced stages in the model when confronted with major changes in the work to be done, a change in project leadership, or substantial changes in the team’s makeup. The project manager and business managers must recognize and consider this important dynamic when con- templating project changes.
Another key aspect of human resource management is getting the project team and the sponsoring business unit to take equal responsibility for making the project a success. The project team members must realize that on their own they cannot possibly make the project a success. They must ensure that the business managers and end users become deeply involved in the project and take an active role. The project team must actively involve the end users, provide information for them to make wise choices, and insist on their participation in major decisions. The business unit must remain engaged in the proj- ect, challenge recommendations, ask questions, and weigh options. It cannot simply sit back and “let the project happen to them.” Key users need to be identified as part of the project team with responsibility for developing and reviewing deliverables. Indeed, some organizations require that the project manager come from the sponsoring business unit. Other organizations assign co-project managers to IT-related projects—one from the IT organization and one from the business unit.
In addition to the development team, each project should have a project steering team, made up of senior managers representing the business and IT organizations, to provide guid- ance and support to the project.
RUBRIC
Excellent Quality
95-100%
Introduction 45-41 points
The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned.
Literature Support
91-84 points
The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned.
Methodology
58-53 points
Content is well-organized with headings for each slide and bulleted lists to group related material as needed. Use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. to enhance readability and presentation content is excellent. Length requirements of 10 slides/pages or less is met.
Average Score
50-85%
40-38 points
More depth/detail for the background and significance is needed, or the research detail is not clear. No search history information is provided.
83-76 points
Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is little integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are included. Summary of information presented is included. Conclusion may not contain a biblical integration.
52-49 points
Content is somewhat organized, but no structure is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. is occasionally detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met.
Poor Quality
0-45%
37-1 points
The background and/or significance are missing. No search history information is provided.
75-1 points
Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is no integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are not included in the summary of information presented. Conclusion does not contain a biblical integration.
48-1 points
There is no clear or logical organizational structure. No logical sequence is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects etc. is often detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met
You Can Also Place the Order at www.collegepaper.us/orders/ordernow or www.crucialessay.com/orders/ordernow Analyze the Water Footprint Results