Introduction to Film as Literature Analysis
Order ID:89JHGSJE83839 Style:APA/MLA/Harvard/Chicago Pages:5-10 Instructions:
Introduction to Film as Literature Analysis
Summary-Analysis-Responses (SAR)
for Introduction to Film as Literature
These are spaces for you to critique and analyze a film focusing on one or two related ideas or issues addressed in the film. Your response will consist of three paragraphs: summary, analysis, and personal response.
- Summary paragraph: Do not summarize the entire film . Briefly restate or paraphrase the
plotline. You should demonstrate that you have watched the film, that you understand the film, and that you understand the motivations of the central characters. You should be able to identify the protagonist and antagonist and you should be aware of the importance of setting, tone, musical and sound effects, and other important elements.
- Analysis paragraph: Focus on analyzing some aspect of the film. For example, what is its
theme and how do we discover it? Is it told in linear or non-linear fashion? Are the actors believable in their roles? Does the film evoke an emotional response or does the film fall flat?
Does the film accomplish the director’s purpose?
Introduction to Film as Literature Analysis
- Personal response: For this section, you should add your own voice to the conversation.
Do you relate to the film in any way? Why or why not? In short, what do you think about this work?
____________________________________________________________________________
Grading:
- (A) Response is focused around one or two related ideas that are clearly articulated or paraphrased, adds something to the conversation, and/or helps clarify an idea for yourself and your classmates. Writing is clear, engaging, grammatically correct and easy to read. Provides concrete ideas through illustrations, specific quotes, relevant examples and/or observations, etc. Addresses all 3 categories of summary, analysis, and personal response.
- (B) Response is focused around one or two related ideas, but ideas need further clarification and development. Overall, writing is clear, engaging, grammatically correct, and easy to read. There may be a few awkward phrases or minor grammatical problems, but response is basically well-written and well-developed. Covers two of the three areas well and gives at least adequate coverage to the other area.
- (C) Response is rather short, general and/or underdeveloped; however, it does indicate that the writer watched the film. The response tends to be rather vague and abstract, rather than providing clarification for ideas addresed. Adequately meets assignment objectives, although there may be several minor problems with style, tone, thesis support, organization or mechanics.
- (D) Response indicates the writer watched the film, but fails to show any adequate analysis or response to it. Closer to a summary than a dialogic response. Text has many problems with style, tone, thesis support, organization and/or mechanics.
- (U) Response addresses broad concepts, but it does not indicate the writer has fully grappled with the ideas presented. Fails to meet assignment objectives and/or has major problems with style, tone, thesis support, organization or mechanics.
RUBRIC
Excellent Quality
95-100%
Introduction 45-41 points
The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned.
Literature Support
91-84 points
The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned.
Methodology
58-53 points
Content is well-organized with headings for each slide and bulleted lists to group related material as needed. Use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. to enhance readability and presentation content is excellent. Length requirements of 10 slides/pages or less is met.
Average Score
50-85%
40-38 points
More depth/detail for the background and significance is needed, or the research detail is not clear. No search history information is provided.
83-76 points
Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is little integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are included. Summary of information presented is included. Conclusion may not contain a biblical integration.
52-49 points
Content is somewhat organized, but no structure is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. is occasionally detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met.
Poor Quality
0-45%
37-1 points
The background and/or significance are missing. No search history information is provided.
75-1 points
Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is no integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are not included in the summary of information presented. Conclusion does not contain a biblical integration.
48-1 points
There is no clear or logical organizational structure. No logical sequence is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects etc. is often detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met
You Can Also Place the Order at www.collegepaper.us/orders/ordernow or www.crucialessay.com/orders/ordernow Introduction to Film as Literature Analysis