Order ID:89JHGSJE83839 | Style:APA/MLA/Harvard/Chicago | Pages:5-10 |
Instructions:
A Fact Sheet And A Comparison Grid For The Agenda
Healthcare may appear to you to have been a matter of national debate among political leaders for as long as you can remember.
Healthcare has been a policy issue and a source of controversy since the administration of John Adams, the second president of the United States. In 1798, Adams enacted legislation requiring sailors to set away 20 cents per month from their wages to meet medical expenses. This was the first major piece of healthcare legislation in the United States, and the issue has since been intertwined into presidential agendas and political discussion.
You may be asked to contribute expertise, guidance, and/or comments on healthcare issues while they are debated for inclusion in new policy as a healthcare practitioner. You may also be involved in the development of new organizational policies and responses to legislative changes. For all of these reasons, you should be prepared to discuss current national healthcare challenges.
You will examine recent presidential healthcare agendas in this assignment. You’ll also create a fact sheet to highlight the importance of a healthcare issue as well as the influence of recent or prospective policies on this issue.
How to Get Ready:
Examine the current/sitting U.S. president’s and the two previous presidential administrations’ agenda priorities.
Choose a healthcare topic that has been addressed by each of the last three presidential administrations in the United States.
Consider the focus of their distinct agendas, as well as the financial resources allocated to tackling the healthcare issue you chose.
Consider how you would convey the relevance of a healthcare issue to a politician or member of their staff in order for it to be included on an agenda.
The Assignment: A title page, an introduction, a goal statement, and a conclusion with a 1- to 2-page Comparison Grid, 1-page Analysis, and 1-page narrative. This is an APA-formatted paper.
Part 1: Grid for comparing agendas
Complete Part 1: Agenda Comparison Grid based on the current/sitting U.S. president and the two past presidential administrations’ agendas connected to the public health concern you picked using the Agenda Comparison Grid Template provided in the Learning Resources. Make certain to address the following points:
Identify and describe the population health concern you’ve chosen, as well as the variables that contribute to it.
Describe the focus of the administrative agenda on the problem you choose.
Determine how much money and other resources the current and two previous presidents set aside for this issue.
Explain how each presidential administration dealt with the problem.
A minimum of three resources must be employed.
Part 2: Comparison Grid Analysis of the Agenda
Complete the Part 2: Agenda Comparison Grid Analysis section of the template using the information you recorded in Part 1: Agenda Comparison Grid:
Which administrative agency is most likely to assist you in addressing the healthcare issue you’ve chosen?
How do you believe the current and two past presidents will address your chosen healthcare issue? How does it manage to stay put?
Who would you pick as the entrepreneur, advocate, and sponsor of the healthcare problem you chose for the current and two past presidents?
Part 3: Storytelling
Create a 1-page narrative using the information recorded on the template in Parts 1 and 2 to speak with a policymaker/legislator or a member of their staff about this healthcare issue. Make certain to address the following points:
Explain why this healthcare issue is critical and should be addressed on the legislative agenda.
Justify the nurse’s role in setting the agenda for healthcare concerns.
At least two outside resources and 2-3 course-specific materials are thoroughly integrated into the response, which fully supports the summary presented.
Part 1: Comparison Grid for Agendas-
-Identify a public health issue that needs to be addressed.
-Explain the Population Health issue you choose and the elements that influence it.
(5) (5 percent ) + 5 (5 percent )
The response identifies and characterizes a community health risk in a straightforward and accurate manner.
a) (4 percent ) 4 (4 percent )
The response only obliquely acknowledges and outlines a public health issue.
3.0 (3.5 percent ) -3.5% (3.5 percent )
The comment incorrectly identifies and explains a problem with population health.
ZERO (0 percent ) + 3 (3 percent )
A population health concern’s identification and description is missing or incomplete.
Part 1: Comparison Grid for Agendas-
– Describe the current and two previous presidents’ administrative agenda priorities on this topic.
– Determine how much money and other resources the current and two previous presidents allotted to this issue.
– Describe how each presidential administration dealt with the issue.
– 20 – 18 % – 18 % – 18 % – 18 % – (20 percent )
The response describes the presidential administrations’ focus on the topic, the financial and resource allocation allocated to the issue, and how each presidential administration tackled the issue in a straightforward and accurate manner. There are at least three resources used.
16 (16%) – 17 (16%) (17 percent )
The response describes the presidential administrations’ concentration on the subject, the financial and resource allocation committed to the issue, and how each presidential administration treated the issue in a general way. There are only two resources used.
14th (14 percent ) 15 – (15 percent )
The response misrepresents the presidential administrations’ focus on the subject, as well as the financial and resource allocations committed to the issue and how each presidential administration treated the issue. There is only one resource used.
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 (13 percent )
There is no description of the presidential administrations’ focus on the subject, budgetary and resource allocation for the issue, or explanation of how each presidential administration treated the topic. There are no resources used.
Part 2: Analysis of the Agenda Comparison Grid- Address the following:
-Which administrative agency would most likely be in charge of assisting you in dealing with the healthcare issue you chose?
-How do you think your chosen healthcare issue will be addressed? How does it manage to stay put?
-Who would you pick as the entrepreneur, advocate, or sponsor of the healthcare problem you chose for the current and former presidents?
23 percent – 25 percent – 23 percent – 23 percent – 23 percent – 23 percent – 23 percent (25 percent )
-The response identifies an administrative agency that is most likely to be in charge of dealing with the selected healthcare issue in a straightforward and accurate manner.
-Response illustrates how the healthcare problem gets on the agenda and stays there in a clear and truthful manner.
– The response clearly and accurately identifies the healthcare issue’s entrepreneur/champion/sponsor.
20. (20 percent ) 22 – (22 percent )
-The response obliquely specifies an administrative agency that might be in charge of dealing with the chosen healthcare issue.
-Response adequately shows how the healthcare problem becomes and stays on the agenda.
-Identification of the healthcare issue’s entrepreneur, advocate, or sponsor is hazy.
eighteen (18 percent ) 19 – (19 percent )
-The administrative agency in charge of dealing with the selected health-care concern is incorrectly identified.
-The explanation of how the healthcare problem gets on the agenda and stays there is either ambiguous or false.
-The entrepreneur/champion/sponsor of the healthcare problem chosen is incorrect or does not correspond to the healthcare issue.
17 – 0 % 0 % 0 % 0 % 0 % 0 (17 percent )
-An administrative agency in charge of dealing with the chosen healthcare concern has not been identified.
-Explanation of how the healthcare problem gets on the table and stays there is either ambiguous or absent.
-Identification of the healthcare issue’s entrepreneur/champion/sponsor is ambiguous and erroneous, or none at all.
Narrative:
Create a 1-2-page narrative based on your Agenda Comparison Grid for the healthcare topic you chose to speak with a policymaker/legislator or a member of their staff about this healthcare issue.
-Explain why this healthcare issue is critical and should be placed on the legislative agenda.
-Define the nurse’s role in setting the agenda for healthcare issues 32 (32 percent ) 35 – (35 percent )
Produces a well-developed, truthful, and compelling story.
The response includes a comprehensive, detailed, and precise synthesis of two outside materials on why this healthcare issue is critical and should be addressed on the legislative agenda. At least two outside resources and 2-3 course-specific materials are thoroughly integrated into the response, which fully supports the summary presented.
The role of the nurse in establishing the agenda for healthcare concerns is accurately and comprehensively justified in the responses.
31 (28%) – 28 (28%) – 28 (28%) – 28 (28%) – 28 (31 percent )
Produces a detailed and accurate narrative.
The response gives an accurate summary of at least one outside reference on why this healthcare problem is significant and should be on the legislative agenda. At least one outside resource and 2-3 course-specific materials are included in the response to support the summary presented.
The nurse’s role in setting the agenda for healthcare concerns is well-supported by the responses.
27 (25%) – 25 (25%) – 25 (25%) – 25 (25%) – 25 (27 percent )
Creates a partially accurate or incomplete narrative.
The response gives a hazy or erroneous overview of outside resources reviewed on why this healthcare problem is essential and should be on the legislative agenda. The response incorporates resources that may support the provided summary to the bare minimum.
The comments somewhat justify the nurse’s role in setting the agenda for healthcare concerns.
24 – 0 (zero percent) (24 percent )
The response gives a hazy and erroneous summary of why this healthcare issue is essential and should be addressed, with no outside resources evaluated.
RUBRIC |
||||||
Excellent Quality 95-100%
|
Introduction
45-41 points The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned. |
Literature Support 91-84 points The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned. |
Methodology 58-53 points Content is well-organized with headings for each slide and bulleted lists to group related material as needed. Use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. to enhance readability and presentation content is excellent. Length requirements of 10 slides/pages or less is met. |
|||
Average Score 50-85% |
40-38 points More depth/detail for the background and significance is needed, or the research detail is not clear. No search history information is provided. |
83-76 points Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is little integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are included. Summary of information presented is included. Conclusion may not contain a biblical integration. |
52-49 points Content is somewhat organized, but no structure is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. is occasionally detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met. |
|||
Poor Quality 0-45% |
37-1 points The background and/or significance are missing. No search history information is provided. |
75-1 points Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is no integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are not included in the summary of information presented. Conclusion does not contain a biblical integration. |
48-1 points There is no clear or logical organizational structure. No logical sequence is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects etc. is often detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met |
|||
You Can Also Place the Order at www.collegepaper.us/orders/ordernow or www.crucialessay.com/orders/ordernow |
A Fact Sheet And A Comparison Grid For The Agenda