Order ID:89JHGSJE83839 | Style:APA/MLA/Harvard/Chicago | Pages:5-10 |
Instructions:
a multi-part question about business ethics
There are two parts to this assignment. Part one requires a 250-word response and two references. Part two requires a 1200 word response with three references.
(1) You are a senior executive at your firm. A senior executive from your main competitor recently conducted an extensive interview with you for a more lucrative position with this company. After not hearing from the interviewer, you conducted some research and discovered that this was a phony interview conducted solely for the purpose of gathering competitive intelligence. You’re well aware that this phony interview is against Christian religious ethics.
a. Explain why the phony interview violated your READ assignment’s discussion of Christian religious ethics. It’s critical that your worldview claims match those in the attached READ assignment. Don’t go off on a tangent about your own personal beliefs.
b. Which of the other five ethical perspectives (other than religious) could someone use to justify the phony interview? With the point of view you chose, which rationalization strategy would the person employ?
(2) Write an essay of at least 1200 words in which you respond to the questions and prompts below. Your essay should show that you understand the key terms and concepts from this unit’s READ and ATTEND assignments. You must use APA-formatted headings to organize your work. At least two scholarly journal articles, as well as the course textbook, are required for research. In-text citations and a list of references should be used to demonstrate your research.
Write a one-paragraph summary of two to three strategic issues that Starbucks has faced in the last 12 months. The sources you use to respond to this prompt should be trustworthy, but not necessarily academic.
Take a look at what Starbucks says on its website about ethical sourcing. Which of the six ethical perspectives discussed in Chapter 5 of the textbook best describes Starbucks’ commitment to ethical sourcing, and why? Which of the six perspectives is the most diametrically opposed to Starbucks’ commitment to ethical sourcing, and why?
Which growth strategies did Starbucks employ to become a market leader?
Should Starbucks change its corporate-level strategies in the midst of a downturn? Explain.
RUBRIC |
||||||
Excellent Quality 95-100%
|
Introduction
45-41 points The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned. |
Literature Support 91-84 points The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned. |
Methodology 58-53 points Content is well-organized with headings for each slide and bulleted lists to group related material as needed. Use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. to enhance readability and presentation content is excellent. Length requirements of 10 slides/pages or less is met. |
|||
Average Score 50-85% |
40-38 points More depth/detail for the background and significance is needed, or the research detail is not clear. No search history information is provided. |
83-76 points Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is little integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are included. Summary of information presented is included. Conclusion may not contain a biblical integration. |
52-49 points Content is somewhat organized, but no structure is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. is occasionally detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met. |
|||
Poor Quality 0-45% |
37-1 points The background and/or significance are missing. No search history information is provided. |
75-1 points Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is no integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are not included in the summary of information presented. Conclusion does not contain a biblical integration. |
48-1 points There is no clear or logical organizational structure. No logical sequence is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects etc. is often detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met |
|||
You Can Also Place the Order at www.collegepaper.us/orders/ordernow or www.crucialessay.com/orders/ordernow
a multi-part question about business ethics |
a multi-part question about business ethics