Order ID:89JHGSJE83839 | Style:APA/MLA/Harvard/Chicago | Pages:5-10 |
Instructions:
A savvy ALEC poses a threat to public education
A Smart ALEC Threatens Public Education According to Underwood and Mead (2012), Coordinated efforts to draft model legislation targeted at defunding and undermining public schools is the signature work of this conservative organization. utilize APA format.
Please provide detailed responses to the following questions: To whom does ALEC appeal in its fight for school privatization?
What is the primary goal of ALEC’s proposed legislation?
ALEC introduces market elements into schools and the teaching profession in what ways?
What impact would privatization have on people of many ethnicities, languages, cultures, and disabilities if ALEC’s push for privatization succeeds in demolishing public schools?
What are some of the questions that supporters of public education would want to ask when new legislation is introduced?
Does ALEC’s influence, as outlined in this article, help or hinder democracy?
In what ways, in your opinion, will ALEC’s campaign for privatization benefit or harm society as a whole?
What happens to our democracy if we revert to a system in which educational access is determined by corporate interests and segregated by class, language, aptitude, race, and religion? Who pays in the end if we push for free-market education?
Underwood, J., and Mead, J. F. (2009). A smart ALEC undermines public education. (2012). A well-informed ALEC poses a threat to public education. 5155 in Phi Delta Kappan, 93(6). https://doi.org/10.1177/003172171209300612
RUBRIC |
||||||
Excellent Quality 95-100%
|
Introduction
45-41 points The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned. |
Literature Support 91-84 points The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned. |
Methodology 58-53 points Content is well-organized with headings for each slide and bulleted lists to group related material as needed. Use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. to enhance readability and presentation content is excellent. Length requirements of 10 slides/pages or less is met. |
|||
Average Score 50-85% |
40-38 points More depth/detail for the background and significance is needed, or the research detail is not clear. No search history information is provided. |
83-76 points Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is little integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are included. Summary of information presented is included. Conclusion may not contain a biblical integration. |
52-49 points Content is somewhat organized, but no structure is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. is occasionally detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met. |
|||
Poor Quality 0-45% |
37-1 points The background and/or significance are missing. No search history information is provided. |
75-1 points Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is no integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are not included in the summary of information presented. Conclusion does not contain a biblical integration. |
48-1 points There is no clear or logical organizational structure. No logical sequence is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects etc. is often detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met |
|||
You Can Also Place the Order at www.collegepaper.us/orders/ordernow or www.crucialessay.com/orders/ordernow |
A savvy ALEC poses a threat to public education