A Solution to Food Deserts: Micro Farms
Order ID:89JHGSJE83839 Style:APA/MLA/Harvard/Chicago Pages:5-10 Instructions:
A Solution to Food Deserts
Crystal Mathison
Professor Harris
Written Communication
15 October 2018
A Solution to Food Deserts: Micro Farms
In the United States, about 23.5 million people live in food deserts, low-income areas with limited access to affordable, healthy food such as fresh fruits and vegetables. Residents of food deserts often have poor diets and related health problems, including diabetes and heart disease. Most food deserts are in cities such as Detroit, Milwaukee, Phoenix, and Oklahoma City. However, living in a rural area does not assure an abundance of fresh food options. In
fact, the United States Department of Agriculture (USDA) reports that around 2.3 million people, or 2.2 percent of all U.S. households, live in low-income rural areas that are more than 10 miles from a grocery store.
A recent trend in agriculture called micro farming presents a possible solution to food deserts. A micro farm is a small-scale farm that uses less than five acres of land to raise vegetables, fruit, nuts, herbs, mushrooms, and even
small livestock (Movahed, 2015). Because micro farms are compact, farmers do not need to invest in expensive equipment such as tractors and harvesters, but can use hand tools to manage their plots. Rather than relying on
harmful herbicides, pesticides, and chemical fertilizers, micro farmers use organic methods such as composting that biuld the soil and encourage plentiful harvests. The aim is to build a sustainable ecosystem that promotes
growth. For example, composted soil uses worms to process waste, add fertilizer, and serve as a food source for small livestock. Beds of straw discourage weeds and support mushrooms. Flowering plants attract bees, which
pollinate fruit trees and bushes.
In cities, micro farms do more than provide food for their owners and others. They also improve the quality of life for residents by reducing heat islands, clusters of structures that are warmer than surrounding locations (Harris, n.d.). Planting crops and fruit or nut trees in abandoned lots freshens the immediate and nearby areas. Instead of using heat-absorbing tar or asphalt to cover roofs, rooftop gardens keep buildings cool, absorb rainwater, and dillute pollutants in the water and air.
In rural locations, micro farms can sustain families and provide local employment. For example, Jean-Martin and Maude-Helene Fortier use low-technology, organic practices in Quebec to manage a micro farm that realizes about 45 percent profit and produces an income for the couple and two employees (Fortier, 2015).
Micro farms include private gardens in yards and on rooftops, community gardens in abandoned or underused lots, hydroponic growing operations in underused buildings, and sustainable farms that produce cheese, honey, herbs, and other goods for sale and profit.
In short, for communities in food deserts, micro farms provide affordable sources of nutritious food and possible avenues for profitable enterprises.
Works Cited
This file created specifically for Shlesh Paudel
This file created specifically for Shlesh Paudel
This file created specifically for Shlesh Paudel
This file created specifically for Shlesh Paudel
This file created specifically for Shlesh Paudel
This file created specifically for Shlesh Paudel
This file created specifically for Shlesh Paudel
This file created specifically for Shlesh Paudel
This file created specifically for Shlesh Paudel
RUBRIC
Excellent Quality
95-100%
Introduction 45-41 points
The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned.
Literature Support
91-84 points
The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned.
Methodology
58-53 points
Content is well-organized with headings for each slide and bulleted lists to group related material as needed. Use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. to enhance readability and presentation content is excellent. Length requirements of 10 slides/pages or less is met.
Average Score
50-85%
40-38 points
More depth/detail for the background and significance is needed, or the research detail is not clear. No search history information is provided.
83-76 points
Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is little integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are included. Summary of information presented is included. Conclusion may not contain a biblical integration.
52-49 points
Content is somewhat organized, but no structure is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. is occasionally detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met.
Poor Quality
0-45%
37-1 points
The background and/or significance are missing. No search history information is provided.
75-1 points
Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is no integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are not included in the summary of information presented. Conclusion does not contain a biblical integration.
48-1 points
There is no clear or logical organizational structure. No logical sequence is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects etc. is often detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met
You Can Also Place the Order at www.collegepaper.us/orders/ordernow or www.crucialessay.com/orders/ordernow A Solution to Food Deserts